Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Christian Werner Boehm v. Simone Boehm

Date: 06-12-2015

Case Number: 2D14-4507

Judge: Luca

Court: Florida Court of Appeal, Second District on appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County

Plaintiff's Attorney: Nicholas L. Ottaviano of Florin Roebig, P.A., Palm Harbor, for Appellant.

Defendant's Attorney: Michelle Ralat Brinner and Mark F. Baseman of Older, Lundy & Alvarez, Attorneys at Law, Tampa, for Appellee.

Description:
Christian Boehm appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Mr. Boehm argues that the trial court improperly calculated his child support obligation by finding that Ms. Boehm had a monthly net income of $1328. Ms. Boehm concedes that the child support guidelines worksheet attached to the final judgment did not

accurately reflect her net monthly income. We reverse and remand with instructions for

the trial court to determine Ms. Boehm's actual monthly income and recalculate Mr.

Boehm's child support obligation accordingly. We affirm on all other issues raised in

this appeal without comment.
Outcome:
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Christian Werner Boehm v. Simone Boehm?

The outcome was: Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

Which court heard Christian Werner Boehm v. Simone Boehm?

This case was heard in Florida Court of Appeal, Second District on appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, FL. The presiding judge was Luca.

Who were the attorneys in Christian Werner Boehm v. Simone Boehm?

Plaintiff's attorney: Nicholas L. Ottaviano of Florin Roebig, P.A., Palm Harbor, for Appellant.. Defendant's attorney: Michelle Ralat Brinner and Mark F. Baseman of Older, Lundy & Alvarez, Attorneys at Law, Tampa, for Appellee..

When was Christian Werner Boehm v. Simone Boehm decided?

This case was decided on June 12, 2015.