Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Florida v. Norman Earle Grimm, Jr.
Date: 12-31-1998
Case Number:
Judge:
Court: Circuit Court, Santa Rosa County, Florida
Plaintiff's Attorney: Santa Rosa County, Florida, District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Milton Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Milton, Florida, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with capital murder.
Norman Grim, with one count of first degree murder
and one count of sexual battery with a weapon (1 R 9-12). He pled not guilty to
those offenses (1 R 13), and the State later filed a notice that it intended to seek the
death penalty if he was convicted of the murder (1 R 18). Later, at his request, the
court appointed Dr. James Larson, a psychologist, to evaluate his competency and
sanity (1 R 48-49, 50-53, 94-96). Grim or the State also filed the following motions
or notices relevant to this appeal:
1. Notice on Defendant's Statements and Motion to Determine voluntariness (1
R 100-103). Denied (2 R 202-205)
2. Notice of Intent [by the defendant] to Introduce Victim Hearsay Statements
(1 R 132-33). The court refused to let Grim introduce the hearsay (2 R 206-210).
3. Motion to Suppress evidence obtained through a search of Grim's home (1
R 134-35). Denied (1 R 200-201).
4. Notice of Intent to Present Expert Testimony of Mental Mitigation Pursuant
to Rule 3.202, Fla. R. Crim. P.
Almost from the beginning of this case, Grim indicated he wanted to waive his
right to present any mitigating evidence should his case proceed to the penalty
phase hearing. Shortly before his trial began, the court, following the procedure
outlined by this Court in Koon v. Dugger, 619 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 1993), found that
he had made a valid waiver of the right, and it heard what mitigation Grim's penalty
phase lawyer believed he could prove (2 R 211-15). The defendant proceeded to
trial before Judge Kenneth Bell, and after the jury had heard the evidence, argument,
and law, it found the defendant guilty as charged on both counts (2 R 219).
Accordingly, he proceeded to the penalty phase portion of the trial, and the state
presented evidence of, and the court would eventually found it had proven, the
following aggravators:
1. At the time of the murder, Grim was on parole.
2. The defendant had several convictions for violent felonies although they had
occurred in 1981 or 1982.
3. Grim committed a sexual battery at the time of the murder.
Norman Grim, with one count of first degree murder
and one count of sexual battery with a weapon (1 R 9-12). He pled not guilty to
those offenses (1 R 13), and the State later filed a notice that it intended to seek the
death penalty if he was convicted of the murder (1 R 18). Later, at his request, the
court appointed Dr. James Larson, a psychologist, to evaluate his competency and
sanity (1 R 48-49, 50-53, 94-96). Grim or the State also filed the following motions
or notices relevant to this appeal:
1. Notice on Defendant's Statements and Motion to Determine voluntariness (1
R 100-103). Denied (2 R 202-205)
2. Notice of Intent [by the defendant] to Introduce Victim Hearsay Statements
(1 R 132-33). The court refused to let Grim introduce the hearsay (2 R 206-210).
3. Motion to Suppress evidence obtained through a search of Grim's home (1
R 134-35). Denied (1 R 200-201).
4. Notice of Intent to Present Expert Testimony of Mental Mitigation Pursuant
to Rule 3.202, Fla. R. Crim. P.
Almost from the beginning of this case, Grim indicated he wanted to waive his
right to present any mitigating evidence should his case proceed to the penalty
phase hearing. Shortly before his trial began, the court, following the procedure
outlined by this Court in Koon v. Dugger, 619 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 1993), found that
he had made a valid waiver of the right, and it heard what mitigation Grim's penalty
phase lawyer believed he could prove (2 R 211-15). The defendant proceeded to
trial before Judge Kenneth Bell, and after the jury had heard the evidence, argument,
and law, it found the defendant guilty as charged on both counts (2 R 219).
Accordingly, he proceeded to the penalty phase portion of the trial, and the state
presented evidence of, and the court would eventually found it had proven, the
following aggravators:
1. At the time of the murder, Grim was on parole.
2. The defendant had several convictions for violent felonies although they had
occurred in 1981 or 1982.
3. Grim committed a sexual battery at the time of the murder.
Outcome:
The defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to death. He was executed on October 29, 2025.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Florida v. Norman Earle Grimm, Jr.?
The outcome was: The defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to death. He was executed on October 29, 2025.
Which court heard State of Florida v. Norman Earle Grimm, Jr.?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Santa Rosa County, Florida, FL.
Who were the attorneys in State of Florida v. Norman Earle Grimm, Jr.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Santa Rosa County, Florida, District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Milton Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was State of Florida v. Norman Earle Grimm, Jr. decided?
This case was decided on December 31, 1998.