Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Donna Kubitz, et al. v. David B. Winkles, et al.
Date: 07-16-2003
Case Number: Unknown
Judge: Paul A. Rasmusen
Court: Circuit Court, Santa Rosa County, Florida
Plaintiff's Attorney:
John E. Booth of Michles & Booth, P.A., Pennsacola, Florida
Defendant's Attorney:
Michael W. Kehoe of Fuller, Johnson & Farrell, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida
Defendant claimed that he contacted the doctor's office to verify that the medications could be dispensed to Mr. Kubitz but could not produce computer records to show that records were kept contemporaneously with the alleged calls to the doctor's office for authorization.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Donna Kubitz, et al. v. David B. Winkles, et al.?
The outcome was: Plaintiffs' verdict awarding $600,000 to Kubitz's daughter, $200,000 to his son. The jury found that Kubitz was partially at fault resulting in a reduction of the award to $100,000 each.
Which court heard Donna Kubitz, et al. v. David B. Winkles, et al.?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Santa Rosa County, Florida, FL. The presiding judge was Paul A. Rasmusen.
Who were the attorneys in Donna Kubitz, et al. v. David B. Winkles, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: John E. Booth of Michles & Booth, P.A., Pennsacola, Florida. Defendant's attorney: Michael W. Kehoe of Fuller, Johnson & Farrell, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida.
When was Donna Kubitz, et al. v. David B. Winkles, et al. decided?
This case was decided on July 16, 2003.