Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

PHT Corporation v. eTrials Worldwide

Date: 08-24-2005

Case Number: 1:04-cv-00821-GMS

Judge: Gregory M. Sleet

Court: United States District Court for the District of Delaware - New Castle County

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Josy W. Ingersoll of Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, Delaware

Defendant's Attorney:

Julia Heaney of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel, Wilmington, Delaware

Description:

PHT Corporation sued eTrials Worldwide for patent infringement of PHT's patent for of electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) solutions software. PHT Corporation, the market-leading provider of electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) solutions used in over 165 trials worldwide, today announced that it has reached an agreement with etrials Worldwide, Inc to settle the intellectual property lawsuit filed by PHT in July, 2004. PHT Corporation is the market-leading provider of electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) solutions used in over 165 trials worldwide. More than 65 biopharmaceutical and medical device companies, including 13 of the top 15 drug development firms in the world, rely on PHT's innovative and comprehensive ePRO solutions for their Phase I-IV clinical studies. PHT's integrated Product Suite enables successful clinical trials by improving data quality, reducing data variance, and providing real-time access to the data collected. FDA and other regulatory authorities have approved new drug applications that include endpoint data collected using PHT's Product Suite. PHT's experience includes more than 75,000 subjects at 9,000 clinical sites in 61 languages and 59 countries around the globe. PHT is headquartered in Charlestown, MA, and Geneva, Switzerland.

The defenses asserted by etrials Worldwide, Inc. are not available.

Outcome:
The terms of the settlement agreement were not disclosed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
None

About This Case

What was the outcome of PHT Corporation v. eTrials Worldwide?

The outcome was: The terms of the settlement agreement were not disclosed

Which court heard PHT Corporation v. eTrials Worldwide?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Delaware - New Castle County, DE. The presiding judge was Gregory M. Sleet.

Who were the attorneys in PHT Corporation v. eTrials Worldwide?

Plaintiff's attorney: Josy W. Ingersoll of Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, Delaware. Defendant's attorney: Julia Heaney of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel, Wilmington, Delaware.

When was PHT Corporation v. eTrials Worldwide decided?

This case was decided on August 24, 2005.