Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Alfredo Martinez and Justin Page v. Southern California Edison

Date: 06-02-2022

Case Number:

Judge:

Court: Superior Court, Los Angeles County, California

Plaintiff's Attorney:









Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan



Click Here For The Best Los Angeles Employment Law Lawyer Directory





Defendant's Attorney:

Description:
Los Angeles, California employment law lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on job discrimination theories claiming to have been forced out of their jobs after complaining about repeated sexual and racial harassment.



Alfredo Martinez and Justin Page sued Southern California Edison on jury discrimination and retaliation theories. They claimed that Edison's South Bay office had a fraternity-like culture in which racial and sexual harassment was widespread, common and sometimes swept under the rug.
Outcome:
Plaintiffs' verdicts for $24.6 million in compensatory damages Wednesday to plaintiffs Alfredo Martinez and Justin Page, bringing the combined verdict to more than $464.6 million.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Alfredo Martinez and Justin Page v. Southern California E...?

The outcome was: Plaintiffs' verdicts for $24.6 million in compensatory damages Wednesday to plaintiffs Alfredo Martinez and Justin Page, bringing the combined verdict to more than $464.6 million.

Which court heard Alfredo Martinez and Justin Page v. Southern California E...?

This case was heard in Superior Court, Los Angeles County, California, CA.

Who were the attorneys in Alfredo Martinez and Justin Page v. Southern California E...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Los Angeles Employment Law Lawyer Directory.

When was Alfredo Martinez and Justin Page v. Southern California E... decided?

This case was decided on June 2, 2022.