Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
The People of the States of California v. Daniel Flores
Date: 07-31-2026
Case Number:
Judge: Not Available
Court: Superior Court, Los Angeles County, California
Plaintiff's Attorney: Los Angeles County, California, District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney: Alan Jackson
Description:
Los Angeles, California, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with wrongfully eavesdropping on or recording confidential communications.
Digested by Kent Morlan
Daniel Flores, accused of making recordings made in 2024, when he was working in a unit of the Los Angeles Police Department, of officers making racist and other inappropriate statements.
Digested by Kent Morlan
Daniel Flores, accused of making recordings made in 2024, when he was working in a unit of the Los Angeles Police Department, of officers making racist and other inappropriate statements.
Outcome:
A criminal charge is not proof of guilt.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of The People of the States of California v. Daniel Flores?
The outcome was: A criminal charge is not proof of guilt.
Which court heard The People of the States of California v. Daniel Flores?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Los Angeles County, California, CA. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in The People of the States of California v. Daniel Flores?
Plaintiff's attorney: Los Angeles County, California, District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Alan Jackson.
When was The People of the States of California v. Daniel Flores decided?
This case was decided on July 31, 2026.