Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 03-03-2011
Case Style: Steven R. White v. Heng Ly Lim
Case Number: CJ-2006-639
Judge: Dynda R. Post
Court: District Court, Rogers County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff's Attorney: Michael Charles Woodward, Tulsa, Oklahoma
Defendant's Attorney: Donald Dean Cates, Tulsa, Oklahoma for Heng Ly Lim and Rachel Sunnora Lim
Description: The action arose out of a residential real estate transaction. Steven R. White sued Heng Ly Lim, Rachel Sunnora Lim, Karla Yates and Action Real Estate, LLC alleging fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, and violation of Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act.
The claims made and defenses asserted. The Supreme Court, in a 9-0 Opinion, determined that only the remedies allowed by the Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act, 60 O.S. Section 831 et seq. were available to the Plaintiffs. This changed the law in the State of Oklahoma. Upon remand, the Plaintiff dismissed the realtor, Karla Yates and Action Real Estate, LLC with prejudice before trial. The action was tried to the jury for violation of the Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act.
Outcome: Defendant's verdict.
Plaintiff's Experts: None
Defendant's Experts: None
Comments: The case had previously gone to the Supreme Court by reason of discovery issues, i.e., availability of punitive damages and the consequent effect of such on discovery of Defendants' financial information. Such case essentially changed the law, 9-0, as pertains to the remedies available under common law and the Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act claims arising out of the sale of a residential property.