Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 09-19-2003

Case Style: Dennis L. Stewart v. The Oklahoma Publishing Company, Griffin Communications, Inc., and NewsOK.com

Case Number: CJ-02-00490

Judge: Donald D. Thomspon

Court: District Court, Creek Count, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Douglas E. Stall of Latham Stall Wagner Steele, Tulsa, Oklahoma and R. Michael Cole of Fuller, Chlouber & Frizzell, Tulsa, Oklahoma

Defendant's Attorney:

Cliff A. Stark of Kelly Stark Mitchell & Martin, Tulsa, Oklahoma

Phil Rounds of Smiling Law Firm, Tulsa, Oklahoma

Jon A. Epstein of Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Robert W. Nelson of Whitten, Nelson, McGuire, Wood, Terry, Roselius & Dittrich, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Description: Defamation claim by the plaintiff, Dennis L. Stewart, who claimed that he was harmed as a result of the publication by the defendants, Oklahoma Publishing Company, Griffin Television, and NewsOK.com, of information received from the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, that a sex offender lived at the address where the plaintiff lived. The Daily Oklahoman and Oklahoma City's KWTV-Channel 9 jointly operate www.NewsOK.com which received an E-mail from the Oklahoma Department of Corrections that contained sex offender data. NewsOK.com put the database on its server and made it accessible through a search page.

The defendants claimed an absolute privilege with regard to the publication because the information that they received was re-published without change.

The plaintiff, age 46, who moved to Collinsville, Oklahoma in May 2001, and worked at a local cement, is an ordained minister. In February 2002, a neighbor contacted others in the neighborhood telling them that Plaintiff was a registered sex offender. She had obtained the information from the NewsOK site and distributed the information to her neighbors in a flier.

Outcome: Plaintiff's verdict for $200,000 in compensatory damages and $3.5 million in punitive damages.

Plaintiff's Experts: Unavailable

Defendant's Experts: Unavailable

Comments: None



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: