Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 08-30-2021
Case Style:
Case Number: CF-2020-571
Judge: Hesse, Paul
Court: In the District Court in and for Canadian County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff's Attorney: Canadian County District Attorney’s Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Description: El Reno, OK: Criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with:
Count # 1. Count as Filed: DI1M, DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(1)
Date of Offense: 10/05/2020
Party Name Disposition Information
CASTANON-NAVARRO, LIBRADO Disposed: CONVICTION, 08/30/2021. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL(DI1M)
Violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(1)
Outcome: 08-27-2021 CTFREE
CRT MIN. STATE WAS REPRESENTED BY MITCHELL THROWER. DEFT APPEARED IN PERSON WITH ATTORNEY, MICHAEL BRANCH, STANDING IN FOR ATTORNEY, MARK OSBY. THE INTERPRETER, SONYA ARMSTRONG, WAS PRESENT AND GIVEN THE INTERPRETER'S OATH AND THE PROCEEDING WAS RECORDED. THE COURT REPORTER WAS KRISTI WRIGHT. THE DEFT WAS READ THE INTERPRETER LANGUAGE. A COMPLETED PLEA OF GUILTY SUMMARY OF FACTS FORM WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COURT. DEFT WAS SWORN AND TESTIMONY RECEIVED. DEFT WAS ADVISED OF HIS RIGHTS AND ENTERED A PLEA OF GUILTY IN CF-2020-571 AND TR-2020-3346. THE STATE MOVED TO DISMISS TR-2020-3347 WITHOUT COSTS. PURSUANT TO A PLEA AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE AND DEFT; IN COUNT #1, DEFT WAS SENTENCED TO A TEN YEAR SUSPENDED SENTENCE EXCEPT FOR THE FIRST TWO YEARS TO SERVE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. DEFT WAS ORDERED TO PAY A $350.00 VCA, $350.00 FINE AND COSTS. DEFT WAS ORDERED TO BE SUPERVISED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISED PROBATION, WHICH THE COURT APPROVED. IN TR-2020-3346, DEFT WAS SENTENCED TO SERVE ONE YEAR IN THE CANADIAN COUNTY JAIL, TO RUN CONCURRENT WITH CF-2020-571. THE STATE ADVISED THE COURT THAT THE PLEA AGREEMENT WAS FAIR TO THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. DEFT WAS ADVISED OF HIS APPEAL RIGHTS. A RULE 8 ORDER WAS EXECUTED. JUDGE STRUBHAR
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: