Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 02-10-2024

Case Style:

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. McLane/Eastern Inc. D/B/A McLane Northeast

Case Number: 5:20-cv-01628

Judge: Brenda K. Sannes

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Onondaga County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Syracuse Civil Rights Lawyer Directory

Defendant's Attorney: Syracuse, New York civil rights violation claim defense lawyers represented the Defendant.

Description: Syracuse, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory by “failing to interview and failing to ultimately hire” the applicant because of her disability.

A seven-person jury in Syracuse, New York returned a verdict this afternoon to resolve a disability discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency announced today. The jury awarded $1.675 million to the discrimination victim in the case.

After a 3 ½-day trial, the jury found, following just two hours of deliberation, that McLane Northeast, a distribution company with a large facility in Baldwinsville, New York, violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by first refusing to interview a Deaf candidate in whom the company had interest once the company learned that the candidate was disabled. Then the company further violated the ADA by refusing to hire the candidate for the two entry-level warehouse jobs that she applied for, the EEOC said. The jury awarded the Deaf applicant $25,000 in back pay, $150,000 in emotional distress damages, and $1.5 million in punitive damages.

“I’m heartened that the jury sent a loud and clear message with this verdict that discriminating against Deaf job applicants is a violation of the ADA, and that employers who know they may be violating the law but discriminate anyway will be punished harshly,” said Karla Gilbride, EEOC’s General Counsel.

“The law requires an even playing field to ensure that applicants with disabilities have the same job opportunities as all other candidates for open positions; but, as the jury found, that plainly did not happen here,” said Renay Oliver, one of the EEOC trial attorneys who litigated the case.

Caitlin Brown, an EEOC trial attorney who also litigated the case, added, “The jury clearly understood that what McLane did here was wrong — Deaf applicants, and all applicants with disabilities, deserve a fair chance to get jobs to enable them to support themselves and their families.”

Apart from Oliver and Brown, the EEOC’s trial team included Assistant Regional Attorney Nora E. Curtin and Paralegals LaTeesha Vines and Jennifer Carr.

For more information on disability discrimination, please visit

The EEOC’s New York District Office is responsible for processing discrimination charges, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, northern New Jersey, Rhode Island and Vermont.

Outcome: Plaintiff's verdict for $1.7 million.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case