Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 09-11-2023

Case Style:

United States of America v. Lamar Allen Thompson

Case Number: 3:23-CR-5126

Judge: Benjamin H. Settle

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (Pierce County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office in Tacoma

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Tacoma Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory

Description: Tacoma, Washington criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with producing and possessing images of child sexual abuse.

A 2018 investigation revealed that Lamar Allen Thompson, who was on state supervision as a sex offender for a 2016 conviction for molesting two minor children, filmed his molestation of two different minor children. Washington State Department of Corrections Officers arrested Thompson on November 8, 2018. Thompson has been in state or federal custody ever since. At the sentencing hearing, U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle said that the crimes were “cruel and merciless.”

“This is a lengthy sentence, but necessary in this case to protect the community from an offender who would not be deterred,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Gorman. “Despite a prior prison sentence, despite state supervision and registration as a sex offender, Mr. Thompson preyed on the trust of friends and family to horribly harm additional children.”

According to records filed in the case, Thompson’s creation of images of child sexual abuse came to light when he lost his phone at a Tacoma manufacturing plant where he worked. In an effort to locate the phone’s owner, co-workers saw pictures of child sexual abuse and alerted law enforcement. Law enforcement obtained a warrant to review the phone, determined it belonged to Thompson, and discovered he had filmed his abuse of multiple children.

Following his arrest on federal charges, Thompson asked for multiple trial delays and then pleaded guilty in March 2023, on the morning his trial was supposed to begin.

In asking for a 45-year sentence, Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Hampton wrote to the court, “Lamar Thompson committed unspeakable acts of violence against innocent children. Thompson’s depraved and selfish acts were an attack on those children’s psyches. They, not Thompson, will bear the heavy psychological load that all survivors of child sexual abuse must carry. And they will do so for the remainder of their lives…. These children and their families, not Thompson, will ultimately pay the price for Thompson’s selfishness and cruelty. It therefore falls to this Court to speak for the community and state in no uncertain terms that those who commit acts of sexual abuse against the most vulnerable among us cannot escape justice.”

“Today’s significant sentence reflects the horrific nature of continued child victimization by a repeat sex offender, even after prior registration and conviction,” said Special Agent in Charge (SAC) Robert Hammer, who oversees HSI operations in the Pacific Northwest. “HSI is committed to protecting children from predators and encourages the reporting of suspicious behavior to law enforcement.”

The case was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations with assistance from the Tacoma Police Department and the Washington State Department of Corrections.

The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Matthew Hampton and Zachary Dillon.


18 U.S.C. § 2251- Sexual Exploitation of Children
(Production of child pornography)
18 U.S.C. § 2251A- Selling and Buying of Children
18 U.S.C. § 2252- Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors
(Possession, distribution and receipt of child pornography)
18 U.S.C. § 2252A- certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child pornography
18 U.S.C. § 2256- Definitions
18 U.S.C. § 2260- Production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States

Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.

Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.

Federal law prohibits the production, distribution, reception, and possession of an image of child pornography using or affecting any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce (See 18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). Specifically, Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct. Any individual who attempts or conspires to commit a child pornography offense is also subject to prosecution under federal law.

Federal jurisdiction is implicated if the child pornography offense occurred in interstate or foreign commerce. This includes, for example, using the U.S. Mails or common carriers to transport child pornography across state or international borders. Additionally, federal jurisdiction almost always applies when the Internet is used to commit a child pornography violation. Even if the child pornography image itself did not travel across state or international borders, federal law may be implicated if the materials, such as the computer used to download the image or the CD-ROM used to store the image, originated or previously traveled in interstate or foreign commerce.

In addition, Section 2251A of Title 18, United States Code, specifically prohibits any parent, legal guardian or other person in custody or control of a minor under the age of 18, to buy, sell, or transfer custody of that minor for purposes of producing child pornography.

Lastly, Section 2260 of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits any persons outside of the United States to knowingly produce, receive, transport, ship, or distribute child pornography with intent to import or transmit the visual depiction into the United States.

Any violation of federal child pornography law is a serious crime, and convicted offenders face severe statutory penalties. For example, a first time offender convicted of producing child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2251, face fines and a statutory minimum of 15 years to 30 years maximum in prison. A first time offender convicted of transporting child pornography in interstate or foreign commerce under 18 U.S.C. § 2252, faces fines and a statutory minimum of 5 years to 20 years maximum in prison. Convicted offenders may face harsher penalties if the offender has prior convictions or if the child pornography offense occurred in aggravated situations defined as (i) the images are violent, sadistic, or masochistic in nature, (ii) the minor was sexually abused, or (iii) the offender has prior convictions for child sexual exploitation. In these circumstances, a convicted offender may face up to life imprisonment.

It is important to note that an offender can be prosecuted under state child pornography laws in addition to, or instead of, federal law."

Department of Justice

Outcome: Defendant was sentenced to twenty-eight years in prison followed by lifetime supervision.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case