Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 11-28-2022

Case Style:

United States of America v. Neil Cole

Case Number: 1:19-cr-00869

Judge: Edgardo Ramos

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best New York City Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory

If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free.

Description: New York City, New York criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with fraudulently inflate Iconix’s revenue and earnings per share, making false filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and misleading the conduct of audits.

“As a unanimous jury has now found, Neil Cole deceived his company’s investors and auditors in order to make his company appear to be performing better than it was. Cole tried to hide his conduct behind tricks and lies, but the truth is now clear: Cole cooked the books. This verdict sends a message that this Office is committed to holding corporate executives accountable when they resort to fraud, no matter how long it takes. Wall Street should know that we will not be deterred from seeking justice in tough cases.”

According to the allegations contained in the Indictment, the evidence offered at trial, and matters included in public filings:

Iconix, whose shares traded on the NASDAQ, was in the business of acquiring various brands, including clothing and fashion brands, and then licensing those brands to retailers, wholesalers, and suppliers who, in turn, produced and sold clothing and other products bearing the brand names.

Iconix utilized joint ventures (“JVs”) to profit from its brands in foreign markets. With respect to these JVs, Iconix transferred ownership of a trademark or brand to the JV while maintaining a 50 percent ownership interest in the JV itself. The other party involved in the JV purchased a 50 percent interest in the JV from Iconix. As part of the JV agreements, each JV partner was generally entitled to 50 percent of the JV’s licensing revenue. When it entered into a JV, Iconix recognized as revenue the buy-in purchase price paid by the JV partner, less Iconix’s cost basis in the trademarks.

Among the most critical financial metrics disclosed in Iconix’s public filings with the SEC were Iconix’s quarterly and annual revenue and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share (“EPS”). Iconix executives, including COLE, publicly identified revenue and EPS as the principal metrics demonstrating Iconix’s growth. They also touted Iconix’s consistent record of revenue and earnings growth and of meeting or exceeding Wall Street analyst consensus with respect to these metrics.

The Accounting Fraud Scheme

COLE engaged in a scheme to falsely inflate Iconix’s reported revenue and EPS by orchestrating a series of “round trip” transactions in which COLE and a senior Iconix executive induced a JV partner, a Hong Kong-based international apparel licensing company (“Company-1”), to pay artificially inflated buy-in purchase prices for JV interests, with the understanding that Iconix would then reimburse Company-1 for the overpayments. COLE executed the scheme for the purpose of enabling Iconix to report fraudulently inflated revenue and EPS figures based on the inflated buy-in purchase prices it obtained from Company-1.

COLE arranged for Iconix to enter into at least two JVs with Company-1 that included inflated buy-in purchase prices from Company-1: (1) an amendment to a preexisting Southeast Asia joint venture, which closed on or about June 30, 2014 (“SEA-2”), and (2) a second amendment to the Southeast Asia joint venture, which closed on or about September 17, 2014 (“SEA-3”) (collectively, the “SEA JVs”). SEA-2 and SEA-3 involved a fraudulent “round trip” transaction, lacking in economic substance, in which Company-1 paid an artificially inflated buy-in purchase price for its interest in the JV, in exchange for COLE’s agreement that Iconix would give back the inflated portion of the purchase price to Company-1. COLE and a senior Iconix executive hid from Iconix’s lawyers and outside auditors that COLE had reached an understanding with Company-1 to artificially increase the consideration Company-1 paid Iconix in exchange for COLE’s agreement to round-trip the overpayment back to Company-1.

Through the scheme, COLE caused Iconix to report fraudulently inflated revenue and EPS figures to the investing public. COLE did so, in part, to ensure that the reported figures met analyst consensus and to fraudulently convey the impression to the investing public that Iconix was growing quarter after quarter, as COLE had touted to the investing public.

* * *

COLE, 65, of New York, New York, was convicted of one count of securities fraud, six counts of making false filings with the SEC, and one count of improperly influencing the conduct of audits. Each count carries a maximum prison term of 20 years.

The maximum potential sentences in this case are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentence will be determined by the judge.

Mr. Williams praised the outstanding work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the SEC Office of the Inspector General. Mr. Williams also thanked the SEC Division of Enforcement, which previously brought a separate civil action.

This case is being handled by the Office’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jared Lenow, Justin V. Rodriguez, and Andrew Thomas are in charge of the prosecution.

Outcome: 11/28/2022 249 ORDER as to Neil Cole: For the reasons discussed via email and in camera, Defendant's motion to dismiss Alternate Juror No. 1 is denied. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 11/28/2022) (lnl) (Entered: 11/28/2022)
11/28/2022 250 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Neil Cole re: Conference held on 10/27/2022 before Judge Edgardo Ramos. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Sara Beiter, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/19/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/29/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/26/2023. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 11/28/2022)

11/28/2022 251 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Neil Cole. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 10/27/2022 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 11/28/2022)

Defendant was found guilty by a jury.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case