 |
Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto 
|
|
||
|
Information |
Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLawDate: 08-18-2019 Case Style: John Thomas Crawford v. The State of TexasCase Number: 02-19-00199-CR Judge: Per Curiam Court: Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth Plaintiff's Attorney: Joseph W. Spence Defendant's Attorney: Brian S. Eppes
Description:  Office from Home and Make More Money918-582-3993 On May 20, 2019, Appellant John Thomas Crawford filed a notice of appeal indicating his intent to appeal from his September 28, 2018 conviction for possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine in an amount of more than 4 but less than 200 grams. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(d). On May 28, 2019, we notified Crawford of our concern that we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal because his notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). We warned him that we would dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds to continue it. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. We received no response. Our appellate jurisdiction is triggered through a timely filed notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, we do not have jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal and may take no action other than to dismiss. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Outcome: Because Crawford’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we have no Plaintiff's Experts: Defendant's Experts: Comments: |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
