Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 03-27-2024

Case Style:

William Peek v. 3M Company, et al.

Case Number: 3:19-cv-00563

Judge: M. Casey Rodgers

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida (Escambia County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Ashlea Schwarz and Richard M. Paul, III - 816-984-8100

Defendant's Attorney: Charles Franklin Beall, Jr.

Description: Pensacola, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sue on a product liability theory.

More than a century ago, 3M started as a small-scale mining venture in Northern Minnesota, then named Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. Now a global powerhouse, our products improve the daily lives of people around the world.

Product liability focuses on the product itself while negligence focuses on the actions of the manufacturer, seller, and/or distributor. To prove that a defendant should be held strictly liable for a defective product, you must show that the product had a defect which caused an unreasonably dangerous condition.



Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Product liability focuses on the product itself while negligence focuses on the actions of the manufacturer, seller, and/or distributor. To prove that a defendant should be held strictly liable for a defective product, you must show that the product had a defect which caused an unreasonably dangerous condition.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: