Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 08-10-2023
Case Style:
Case Number: 1:23-cv-00069
Judge: Leslie Abrams Gardner
Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia (Dougherty County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Bhavya Chaudhary
Defendant's Attorney: Roger Grantham, Jr.
Description: Albany, Georgia immigration lawyer represented Plaintiffs seeking a writ of mandamus.
"A writ of mandamus is a court order that commands a government official to perform a specific act. In immigration cases, writs of mandamus are often used to compel the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to make a decision on a pending immigration application or petition.
To be successful in a writ of mandamus case, the petitioner must show that:
They have a clear legal right to the relief they are seeking.
There is no other legal remedy available.
The USCIS has a clear duty to act.
The USCIS has failed to act within a reasonable time.
If the court finds that these requirements are met, it will issue a writ of mandamus ordering the USCIS to take action on the petitioner's case.
Writs of mandamus are a powerful tool that can be used to expedite immigration cases. However, they should only be used as a last resort, after other avenues of relief have been exhausted.
Here are some examples of cases where a writ of mandamus may be appropriate:
The USCIS has not made a decision on an immigration application or petition within a reasonable time.
The USCIS has denied an immigration application or petition without a valid reason.
The USCIS has taken an action that is contrary to the law.
If you believe that your immigration case is being unreasonably delayed or that the USCIS has taken an action that is illegal, you may want to consider filing a writ of mandamus. However, it is important to speak with an experienced immigration attorney before filing a writ of mandamus, as there are strict requirements that must be met in order to be successful."
Google Bard
Outcome: 08/10/2023 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal by TRACY RENAUD, DANIEL M RENAUD, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND as to All Parties (GRANTHAM, ROGER) (Entered: 08/10/2023)
08/10/2023 REMARK: In light of 5 Stipulation of Dismissal this case has been closed. (mdm) (Entered: 08/10/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: