Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 12-13-2022
Case Style:
Zachary Switzer v. Northern Tier Retail, LLC d/b/a "Speedway"
Case Number: 0:21-cv-00066
Judge: Katherine M. Menendez
Court: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin county)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan
Click Here For The Best Minneapolis Personal Injury Lawyer Directory
If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.
Defendant's Attorney: Daniel R. Olson and James C. Kovaes
Description: Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores.
MoreLaw Legal News For Minneapolis
The claims made and defenses asserted are not available.
The elements of a personal injury claim are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant to exercise due care, (2) damages and/or injuries caused to Plaintiff, and (3) a direct casual relationship between 1 and 2.
Business owners generally owe a duty of due care to invitees to assure that their property is reasonably safe for visitions.
Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
Defendant's Attorney: Daniel R. Olson and James C. Kovaes
Description: Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores.
The claims made and defenses asserted are not available.
The elements of a personal injury claim are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant to exercise due care, (2) damages and/or injuries caused to Plaintiff, and (3) a direct casual relationship between 1 and 2.
Business owners generally owe a duty of due care to invitees to assure that their property is reasonably safe for visitions.
Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: