Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Carl Anthony Epps, II

Date: 08-15-2025

Case Number: Carl Anthony Epps, II

Judge: John F. Heil, III

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Tulsa

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Carrying, Using, and Brandishing a Firearm During and in Relation to a Crime of Violence in Indian Country in 18 USC 924(c)(1)(A)(ii).



Carl Anthony Epps, II, age 43, was accused of pointing a firearm at outside a bar. In February 2024, Epps was asked to leave a bar for harassing patrons. Upon leaving, Epps threatened an employee at the bar and claimed he had a firearm in his vehicle. Witnesses called 911 and told law enforcement that Epps pulled his vehicle in front of the bar and pointed a rifle with a green laser at the employee. When officers found Epps, they saw the gun sitting in his vehicle.
Outcome:
The Defendant was sentenced to 84 months in prison.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Carl Anthony Epps, II?

The outcome was: The Defendant was sentenced to 84 months in prison.

Which court heard United States of America v. Carl Anthony Epps, II?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County), OK. The presiding judge was John F. Heil, III.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Carl Anthony Epps, II?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Tulsa. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Carl Anthony Epps, II decided?

This case was decided on August 15, 2025.