Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Alexa Pascual, et al. v. Tammy K. Perry
Date: 02-04-2025
Case Number: AC46674
Judge: John W. Parkard
Court: Superior Court, Litchfield County, Connecticut
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Litchfield Real Property Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Litchfield Real Property Lawyer Directory
Description:
Litchfield, Connecticut real property lawyers represented the parties in a quite title action.
The plaintiffs, Alexa Pascual and Freiny Francisco sued Tammy K. Perry,seeking to quiet title, who counterclaimed alleging adverse possession. The plaintiffs claim that the court erroneously concluded that (1) the defendant's and her predecessor in title's use of the disputed area was open and visible; (2) the defendant's predecessor in title's possession of the disputed area was hostile; and (3) the defendant could tack her predecessor in title's period of adverse possession onto her own, and, additionally, (4) the court erred in failing to find that the defendant's adverse possession rights were extinguished by the judgment of foreclosure rendered against the plaintiffs' predecessor in title.
The trial court ruled in Defendant's favor.
* * *
Key Phrases Adverse Possession. Quiet title action. Hostile possession. Tacking doctrine. Residential property dispute.
The plaintiffs, Alexa Pascual and Freiny Francisco sued Tammy K. Perry,seeking to quiet title, who counterclaimed alleging adverse possession. The plaintiffs claim that the court erroneously concluded that (1) the defendant's and her predecessor in title's use of the disputed area was open and visible; (2) the defendant's predecessor in title's possession of the disputed area was hostile; and (3) the defendant could tack her predecessor in title's period of adverse possession onto her own, and, additionally, (4) the court erred in failing to find that the defendant's adverse possession rights were extinguished by the judgment of foreclosure rendered against the plaintiffs' predecessor in title.
The trial court ruled in Defendant's favor.
* * *
Key Phrases Adverse Possession. Quiet title action. Hostile possession. Tacking doctrine. Residential property dispute.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Alexa Pascual, et al. v. Tammy K. Perry?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard Alexa Pascual, et al. v. Tammy K. Perry?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Litchfield County, Connecticut, CT. The presiding judge was John W. Parkard.
Who were the attorneys in Alexa Pascual, et al. v. Tammy K. Perry?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Litchfield Real Property Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Litchfield Real Property Lawyer Directory.
When was Alexa Pascual, et al. v. Tammy K. Perry decided?
This case was decided on February 4, 2025.