Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Michael T. Doughney

Date: 06-12-2000

Case Number: 99-cv-1336

Judge: Hilton

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia - Alexandria

Plaintiff's Attorney: David Neil Ventker of Huff, Poole & Mahoney, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia

Defendant's Attorney: Richard Taylor Rossier of McLeod, Watkinson & Miller, Washington, D.C.

Description:
This lawsuit arose from a dispute between People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals ("PETA"), and Michael Doughney regarding the use of the internet domain name "PETA.ORG" PETA, a non-profit charitable corporation was established in 1980. PETA has affiliated animal protection organizations in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands and India who all operate under the name PETA. On August 4, 1992, PETA was given U.S. Trademark Registration Number 1,705,510 duly issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the service mark "PETA" for educational services; namely providing programs and seminars on the subject of animal rights welfare and promoting the public awareness of the need to prevent cruelty and mistreatment of animals. PETA used the PETA trademark and trade name continuously in interstate commerce and foreign commerce from 1980.


Defendant registered PETA.ORG in September 1995 with Network Solutions for "People Eating Tasty Animals." Doughney's PETA.ORG web site contained information and materials antithetical to PETA's purpose.


On January 29, 1996, PETA send Doughney a letter requesting that he relinquish his registration of PETA.ORG. PETA then complained to Network Solutions which then put the name on hold. PETA brought this suit alleging claims for service mark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1114, unfair competition in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) and Virginia common law service mark dilution and cybersquatting in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(c).

Outcome:
Judgment in favor of Plaintiff.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
For more information about this case, see: 113 F.Supp.2d 915 (E.D.Va. 2000).


Reported by Kent Morlan


About This Case

What was the outcome of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Mich...?

The outcome was: Judgment in favor of Plaintiff.

Which court heard People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Mich...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia - Alexandria, VA. The presiding judge was Hilton.

Who were the attorneys in People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Mich...?

Plaintiff's attorney: David Neil Ventker of Huff, Poole & Mahoney, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia. Defendant's attorney: Richard Taylor Rossier of McLeod, Watkinson & Miller, Washington, D.C..

When was People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Mich... decided?

This case was decided on June 12, 2000.