Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Lucentsucks.com
Date: 05-03-2000
Case Number: 99-cv-1916
Judge: Leonie M. Brinkema
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia - Alexandria Division
Plaintiff's Attorney: Roy G. Decker, Jr. of Stauffer, Mannix, Rommel, Decker & Dulany, LLC, McLean, Virginia
Defendant's Attorney: James W. Pravel of Pravel Intellectual Property Law, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia
Plaintiff alleged htat on August 2, 1998, Russell Johnson registered the domain name lucentsucks.com through Network Solutions, Inc., located in Herndon, Virginia. Plaintiff alleged that the website at this domain contains pornographic photographs and services for sale.
Plaintiff advanced two causes of action: Count I, Trademark Infringement, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1) and 15 U.S.C. 1125(a); and Count II, dilution, Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(c). Plaintiff sought a court order directing NSI to transfer registration of lucentsucks.com to Lucent.
Defendant opposed Lucent's action by asserting that it did not satisfy the in rem jurisdictional requirements of the ACPA; an internet domain name is not "property," for purposes of obtaining in rem jurisdiction; and First Amendment principles would be violated if plaintiff could force forfeiture of defendant's domain name.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Lucentsucks.com?
The outcome was: Complaint dismissed plaintiff's in rem complaint because it could obtain in personam jurisdiction over the domain registrant and could find the registrant. The court also found that Lucent failed to satisfy the due diligence clause, Section 1125(d)(2)(A)(ii)(II)(aa).
Which court heard Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Lucentsucks.com?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia - Alexandria Division, VA. The presiding judge was Leonie M. Brinkema.
Who were the attorneys in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Lucentsucks.com?
Plaintiff's attorney: Roy G. Decker, Jr. of Stauffer, Mannix, Rommel, Decker & Dulany, LLC, McLean, Virginia. Defendant's attorney: James W. Pravel of Pravel Intellectual Property Law, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia.
When was Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Lucentsucks.com decided?
This case was decided on May 3, 2000.