Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Ryan James Shelley v. State of Indiana
Date: 05-01-2016
Case Number: 40A04-1510-CR-1709
Judge: L. Mark Bailey
Court: COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Plaintiff's Attorney: Lyubov Gore
Defendant's Attorney: Pat Magrath
Description:
On December 27th, 2012, Shelley shook his girlfriend’s infant daughter, causing
her death. He was charged with murder,3 battery resulting in death,4 battery
resulting in serious bodily injury,5 aggravated battery,6 and neglect of a
dependent resulting in death.7 Shelley pled guilty to murder as part of a plea
agreement, providing that the court impose a sentence between fifty-five and
sixty years and dismiss his other charges. The trial court sentenced Shelley to
fifty-eight years imprisonment, ordered him to pay a hundred dollar fine, and
dismissed his remaining charges. (App.172-74.) Shelley now appeals.
Discussion and Decision
[3] The authority granted to this Court by Article 7, § 6 of the Indiana Constitution
permitting independent appellate review and revision of criminal sentences was
implemented by the Indiana Supreme Court through Appellate Rule 7(B). We
may “revise a sentence authorized by statute if, after due consideration of the
trial court’s decision, the court finds that the sentence is inappropriate in light of
the nature of the offense and the character of the offender.” Ind. Appellate
Rule 7(B). The primary purpose in this type of review is to “leaven the
outliers” and focus on the aggregate sentence for the crime(s) committed.
Caldwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1125 (Ind. 2008).
[4] The nature of the offense gives us no reason to revise the sentence downward.
Shelley pled guilty to murder of a child for whom he was in a position as
caretaker.
[5] Turning to his character, Shelley has at least 14 criminal convictions (including
two felonies) and one formal juvenile adjudication. His convictions include
visiting a common nuisance, criminal mischief, battery, alcohol and drug
possession, resisting law enforcement, sexual misconduct with a minor, and
failure to register as a sex offender. While he expressed remorse, Shelley
benefited from his plea agreement under which he received less than the
maximum possible penalty.
her death. He was charged with murder,3 battery resulting in death,4 battery
resulting in serious bodily injury,5 aggravated battery,6 and neglect of a
dependent resulting in death.7 Shelley pled guilty to murder as part of a plea
agreement, providing that the court impose a sentence between fifty-five and
sixty years and dismiss his other charges. The trial court sentenced Shelley to
fifty-eight years imprisonment, ordered him to pay a hundred dollar fine, and
dismissed his remaining charges. (App.172-74.) Shelley now appeals.
Discussion and Decision
[3] The authority granted to this Court by Article 7, § 6 of the Indiana Constitution
permitting independent appellate review and revision of criminal sentences was
implemented by the Indiana Supreme Court through Appellate Rule 7(B). We
may “revise a sentence authorized by statute if, after due consideration of the
trial court’s decision, the court finds that the sentence is inappropriate in light of
the nature of the offense and the character of the offender.” Ind. Appellate
Rule 7(B). The primary purpose in this type of review is to “leaven the
outliers” and focus on the aggregate sentence for the crime(s) committed.
Caldwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1125 (Ind. 2008).
[4] The nature of the offense gives us no reason to revise the sentence downward.
Shelley pled guilty to murder of a child for whom he was in a position as
caretaker.
[5] Turning to his character, Shelley has at least 14 criminal convictions (including
two felonies) and one formal juvenile adjudication. His convictions include
visiting a common nuisance, criminal mischief, battery, alcohol and drug
possession, resisting law enforcement, sexual misconduct with a minor, and
failure to register as a sex offender. While he expressed remorse, Shelley
benefited from his plea agreement under which he received less than the
maximum possible penalty.
Outcome:
In light of Shelley’s offense and his character, we conclude the sentence is not inappropriate. Affirmed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Ryan James Shelley v. State of Indiana?
The outcome was: In light of Shelley’s offense and his character, we conclude the sentence is not inappropriate. Affirmed.
Which court heard Ryan James Shelley v. State of Indiana?
This case was heard in COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, IN. The presiding judge was L. Mark Bailey.
Who were the attorneys in Ryan James Shelley v. State of Indiana?
Plaintiff's attorney: Lyubov Gore. Defendant's attorney: Pat Magrath.
When was Ryan James Shelley v. State of Indiana decided?
This case was decided on May 1, 2016.