Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: L.B. v. Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical CEnter
Date: 07-15-2022
Case Number: 11A-MH-153
Judge: Weissmann
Court: Court of Appeals of Indiana on appeal from the Superior Court, Marion County
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: Kyle Mardis
After experiencing "worsening, intensifying voices" and "wanting to escape the torture," L.B. threw his television out a window, shaved his head, and burned down his house. Tr. Vol. II, pp. 9-10. Police found L.B. on foot in a neighboring county. A few days later, he was admitted to the Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Hospital). The Hospital determined L.B. to be mentally ill, dangerous, and in need of immediate restraint. It therefore filed a petition for his regular commitment.
The Hospital does not meaningfully argue against requiring a competency determination before a trial court accepts a civil-commitment respondent's waiver of the right to counsel. Instead, it claims the trial court's failure to do so was harmless because "the evidence still supports a finding that L.B. suffers from a mental illness and is both gravely disabled and a danger to himself." Appellee's Br. p. 9. "[I]nvalid waivers of counsel are not subject to a harmless error analysis." Bumbalough, 873 N.E.2d at 1102. We therefore reverse the trial court's judgment and remand for a new commitment hearing.
About This Case
What was the outcome of In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: L.B. v. Richard...?
The outcome was: The Hospital does not meaningfully argue against requiring a competency determination before a trial court accepts a civil-commitment respondent's waiver of the right to counsel. Instead, it claims the trial court's failure to do so was harmless because "the evidence still supports a finding that L.B. suffers from a mental illness and is both gravely disabled and a danger to himself." Appellee's Br. p. 9. "[I]nvalid waivers of counsel are not subject to a harmless error analysis." Bumbalough, 873 N.E.2d at 1102. We therefore reverse the trial court's judgment and remand for a new commitment hearing.
Which court heard In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: L.B. v. Richard...?
This case was heard in Court of Appeals of Indiana on appeal from the Superior Court, Marion County, IN. The presiding judge was Weissmann.
Who were the attorneys in In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: L.B. v. Richard...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Indianapolis Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free.. Defendant's attorney: Kyle Mardis.
When was In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: L.B. v. Richard... decided?
This case was decided on July 15, 2022.