Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Juan Miguel Placeres Gonzalez v. Constellium Muscle Shoals, L.L.C.
Date: 09-22-2023
Case Number: 4:23-cv-00509
Judge: Kristine G. Baker
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas (Pulaski County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Little Rock Personal Injury Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: K. Bryance Metheny and Samuel A. Morris
This case was filed in the Pulaski County Circuit Court, 60-cv-23-02959, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant who sought a change of venue to the Northern District of Alabama.
"Arkansas auto negligence law is based on the principle that drivers owe a duty of care to other drivers and pedestrians. This means that drivers must act reasonably to avoid causing accidents. If a driver breaches this duty of care and causes an accident, they may be held liable for the damages caused by the accident.
To prove negligence in Arkansas, an injured person must show the following four elements:
The defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff.
The defendant breached that duty of care.
The plaintiff suffered an injury.
The defendant's breach of duty caused the plaintiff's injury.
Examples of negligence in Arkansas auto accidents include:
Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs
Speeding
Distracted driving
Reckless driving
Failing to yield the right-of-way
Following too closely
Failing to obey traffic signals or signs
If an injured person can prove negligence, they may be entitled to recover damages for their medical expenses, lost wages, property damage, pain and suffering, and other losses.
Arkansas is a modified comparative negligence state. This means that an injured person's damages award will be reduced by their percentage of fault for the accident. For example, if an injured person is found to be 20% at fault for the accident, their damages award will be reduced by 20%.
However, Arkansas has a 50% bar rule. This means that an injured person who is found to be 50% or more at fault for the accident is barred from recovering any damages.
If you have been injured in an Arkansas auto accident, it is important to consult with an experienced attorney to discuss your legal rights and options."
Google Bard
About This Case
What was the outcome of Juan Miguel Placeres Gonzalez v. Constellium Muscle Shoal...?
The outcome was: E-MAIL received from Northern District of Alabama confirming the case was received and opened in their district as case number 3:23-cv-01287. (kbc) (Entered: 09/28/2023)
Which court heard Juan Miguel Placeres Gonzalez v. Constellium Muscle Shoal...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas (Pulaski County), AR. The presiding judge was Kristine G. Baker.
Who were the attorneys in Juan Miguel Placeres Gonzalez v. Constellium Muscle Shoal...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Little Rock Personal Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: K. Bryance Metheny and Samuel A. Morris.
When was Juan Miguel Placeres Gonzalez v. Constellium Muscle Shoal... decided?
This case was decided on September 22, 2023.