Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Marlys J. Knoff v. Target Corporation
Date: 11-22-2022
Case Number: 4:22-CV-499
Judge: Claire V. Egan
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan
Click Here For The Best Tulsa Personal Injury Lawyer Directory
If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.
Defendant's Attorney: Anamayan Narendran and Philip Raymond Richards
Description:
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability theory claiming to suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of an accident in one of Defendant's stores caused by the failure on the part of Defendant's employees to exercise due care in the operation and maintenance of the store.
MoreLaw Legal News For Tulsa
This case was filed in the District Court in and for Tulsa County, case number CJ-21-02531, and was removed to federal court by Target.
On December 29, 2019, Plaintiff was an invitee of Defendant Target in its store at 10019 South Memorial Drive in Tulsa. While Plaintiff was walking into the store a Target employee was pushing a line of shopping carts on the sidewalk in front of the store. The employee lost control of the line of carts and several came lose and hit Plaintiff who was knocked to the ground and injured.
The elements of a personal injury claim are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant to exercise due care, (2) damages and/or injuries caused to Plaintiff, and (3) a direct casual relationship between 1 and 2.
Business owners owe a duty of due care in the maintenance and operation of their businesses to minimize the risk of injury or death to business invitees.
Kent Morlan on Torts
Outcome:
Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Marlys J. Knoff v. Target Corporation?
The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Which court heard Marlys J. Knoff v. Target Corporation?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County), OK. The presiding judge was Claire V. Egan.
Who were the attorneys in Marlys J. Knoff v. Target Corporation?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan
Click Here For The Best Tulsa Personal Injury Lawyer Directory
If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.. Defendant's attorney: Anamayan Narendran and Philip Raymond Richards.
When was Marlys J. Knoff v. Target Corporation decided?
This case was decided on November 22, 2022.
Defendant's Attorney: Anamayan Narendran and Philip Raymond Richards
This case was filed in the District Court in and for Tulsa County, case number CJ-21-02531, and was removed to federal court by Target.
On December 29, 2019, Plaintiff was an invitee of Defendant Target in its store at 10019 South Memorial Drive in Tulsa. While Plaintiff was walking into the store a Target employee was pushing a line of shopping carts on the sidewalk in front of the store. The employee lost control of the line of carts and several came lose and hit Plaintiff who was knocked to the ground and injured.
The elements of a personal injury claim are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant to exercise due care, (2) damages and/or injuries caused to Plaintiff, and (3) a direct casual relationship between 1 and 2.
Business owners owe a duty of due care in the maintenance and operation of their businesses to minimize the risk of injury or death to business invitees.
Kent Morlan on Torts
About This Case
What was the outcome of Marlys J. Knoff v. Target Corporation?
The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Which court heard Marlys J. Knoff v. Target Corporation?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County), OK. The presiding judge was Claire V. Egan.
Who were the attorneys in Marlys J. Knoff v. Target Corporation?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Tulsa Personal Injury Lawyer Directory If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.. Defendant's attorney: Anamayan Narendran and Philip Raymond Richards.
When was Marlys J. Knoff v. Target Corporation decided?
This case was decided on November 22, 2022.