Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Mohammed Omar v. Britten Production, LLC, et al.
Date: 05-16-2023
Case Number: 4:22-cv-00204
Judge: Gregory K. Frizzell
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: Dan Folluo and Michael Darin Goss
Description:
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on a premises liability negligence theory.
Plaintiff was working at Woodland Hill Mall on March 6, 2020, when a piece of metal approximately three feet long and three inches wide fell from a sign hanging above him and struck him in the upper back injuring him. Plaintiff was a business invitee at Woodland Hill Mall which was unsafe and, as a direct result, he was injured and damaged.
Plaintiff was working at Woodland Hill Mall on March 6, 2020, when a piece of metal approximately three feet long and three inches wide fell from a sign hanging above him and struck him in the upper back injuring him. Plaintiff was a business invitee at Woodland Hill Mall which was unsafe and, as a direct result, he was injured and damaged.
Outcome:
Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Mohammed Omar v. Britten Production, LLC, et al.?
The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Which court heard Mohammed Omar v. Britten Production, LLC, et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County), OK. The presiding judge was Gregory K. Frizzell.
Who were the attorneys in Mohammed Omar v. Britten Production, LLC, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Tulsa Personal Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Dan Folluo and Michael Darin Goss.
When was Mohammed Omar v. Britten Production, LLC, et al. decided?
This case was decided on May 16, 2023.