Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Edilberto Torrez, Jr.

Date: 02-11-2026

Case Number: 25-cr-00190

Judge: John D. Russell

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Tula

Defendant's Attorney: Carla ReNae Stinnett

Description:
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with smuggling goods into the United States and illegal possession of a machineguns.

18 U.S.C. 545, which provides:



Whoever knowingly and willfully, with intent to defraud the United States, smuggles, or clandestinely introduces or attempts to smuggle or clandestinely introduce into the United States any merchandise which should have been invoiced, or makes out or passes, or attempts to pass, through the customhouse any false, forged, or fraudulent invoice, or other document or paper; or

Whoever fraudulently or knowingly imports or brings into the United States, any merchandise contrary to law, or receives, conceals, buys, sells, or in any manner facilitates the transportation, concealment, or sale of such merchandise after importation, knowing the same to have been imported or brought into the United States contrary to law—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

Proof of defendant’s possession of such goods, unless explained to the satisfaction of the jury, shall be deemed evidence sufficient to authorize conviction for violation of this section.

Merchandise introduced into the United States in violation of this section, or the value thereof, to be recovered from any person described in the first or second paragraph of this section, shall be forfeited to the United States.

The term “United States”, as used in this section, shall not include the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Wake Island, Midway Islands, Kingman Reef, Johnston Island, or Guam.

18 U.S.C. 922 provides:

(a) It shall be unlawful—

(1) for any person—

(4) for any person, other than a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector, to transport in interstate or foreign commerce any destructive device, machinegun (as defined in section 5845 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986), short-barreled shotgun, or short-barreled rifle, except as specifically authorized by the Attorney General consistent with public safety and necessity;
Outcome:
The Defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to 33 months per count as to each of cts. 2 and 3, concurrent. SR: 3 years per count as to each of cts. 2 and 3, concurrent. SMA: $200.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Edilberto Torrez, Jr.?

The outcome was: The Defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to 33 months per count as to each of cts. 2 and 3, concurrent. SR: 3 years per count as to each of cts. 2 and 3, concurrent. SMA: $200.

Which court heard United States of America v. Edilberto Torrez, Jr.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County), OK. The presiding judge was John D. Russell.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Edilberto Torrez, Jr.?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Tula. Defendant's attorney: Carla ReNae Stinnett.

When was United States of America v. Edilberto Torrez, Jr. decided?

This case was decided on February 11, 2026.