ourt Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 10) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant's motion is granted as to plaintiff's claims of disparate treatment on the basis of dis ability under the OADA (part of count 1), retaliation under the OADA (count 3), aiding and abetting discrimination under the OADA (count 4), retaliation under the ADA (count 7), hostile work environment under the OADA, Title VII, and § 1981 (pa rt of counts 2, 6, and 8) and intentional infliction of emotional distress (count 9). Defendant's motion is denied as to plaintiff's claims of disparate treatment on the basis of race and color under the OADA (part of counts 1 and 2), Titl e VII (counts 5 and 6), and § 1981 (part of count 8), and retaliation on the basis of race and color under § 1981 (part of count 8). Plaintiff's claims of disparate treatment on the basis of disability under the OADA (part of count 1) , retaliation under the OADA (count 3), aiding and abetting discrimination under the OADA (count 4), retaliation under the ADA (count 7), hostile work environment under the OADA, Title VII, and § 1981 (part of counts 2, 6, and 8) and intentional infliction of emotional distress (count 9) are dismissed. Plaintiff's remaining claims are disparate treatment on the basis of race and color under the OADA, Title VII, and § 1981, and retaliation on the basis of race and color under  7; 1981. The parties shall file their joint status report no later than July 19, 2024. ; directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 7/19/2024); granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Dismiss (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint, 10 MOTION to Dismiss ) (RGG, Chambers)