Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Vincent Nicholas Petrushkin, aka Vincint Petrushkin, aka Vincent Petrushkin
Date: 07-14-2025
Case Number: 2:21-CR-00164
Judge: Thomas O. Rice
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington (Spokane County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Spokane
Defendant's Attorney: Zach Aayers
Randy Holmes told a confidential informant for the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
("ATFâ€) that he needed a gun to conduct a robbery, and ATF
set up a sting firearm transaction at a Motel 6 in Spokane on
November 5, 2021. Holmes drove to the Motel 6 with
William Burns and Vincent Petrushkin (the defendant here).
Petrushkin believed that they would rob someone at the
Motel 6 but did not know about Holmes's plan to obtain a
gun to conduct future robberies. At the Motel 6, Holmes told
Burns and Petrushkin that he was "gonna do this by myself
homie†and rejected their offers of help. Burns then gave
Holmes a Glock Model 17 9mm semi-automatic handgun.
After Burns transferred the gun to Holmes, Petrushkin asked
if he could see the gun. Petrushkin "held the gun, looked at
it and said hell yeah,†handed the gun back to Holmes, and
got into the backseat of the car. Petrushkin possessed the gun
for approximately five seconds.
The § 2K2.1(c)(1) enhancement applies when a defendant possesses a firearm “in a manner that permits an inference that it facilitated or potentially facilitated . . . felonious conduct.†Routon, 25 F.3d at 819. The district court did not make a finding that Petrushkin possessed a firearm in a manner that potentially emboldened or facilitated his codefendant’s robbery, and the facts in the
record do nt permit the necessary inference. We therefore vacate the 48-month sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion.6
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Vincent Nicholas Petrushkin, ...?
The outcome was: The Defendant elected to plead guilty. The § 2K2.1(c)(1) enhancement applies when a defendant possesses a firearm “in a manner that permits an inference that it facilitated or potentially facilitated . . . felonious conduct.†Routon, 25 F.3d at 819. The district court did not make a finding that Petrushkin possessed a firearm in a manner that potentially emboldened or facilitated his codefendant’s robbery, and the facts in the record do nt permit the necessary inference. We therefore vacate the 48-month sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion.6
Which court heard United States of America v. Vincent Nicholas Petrushkin, ...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington (Spokane County), wa. The presiding judge was Thomas O. Rice.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Vincent Nicholas Petrushkin, ...?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Spokane. Defendant's attorney: Zach Aayers.
When was United States of America v. Vincent Nicholas Petrushkin, ... decided?
This case was decided on July 14, 2025.