Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Jayde Mucklow
Date: 03-04-2016
Case Number: 2:15-cr-00101-SWS
Judge: Scott W. Skavdahl
Court: United States District Court for the District of Wyoming (Laramie County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Stephanie Sprecher
Defendant's Attorney: Tom Smith
Description:
Cheyenne, WY - Jayde Mucklow, 29, of Englewood, Colorado, was sentenced by Federal District Court Judge Scott W. Skavdahl on March 3, 2016, for possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, and aiding and abetting. Mucklow was arrested in Denver, Colorado. She received 66 months imprisonment, to be followed by four years of supervised release, and was ordered to pay a $250.00 fine and a $100.00 special assessment. This case results from an ongoing Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) joint investigation conducted by the Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation and the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. The principal mission of the OCDETF program is to identify, disrupt and dismantle the most serious drug trafficking, weapons trafficking and money laundering organizations, and those primarily responsible for the nation’s illegal drug supply.
Outcome:
Defendant was sentenced to 66 months in prison.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Jayde Mucklow?
The outcome was: Defendant was sentenced to 66 months in prison.
Which court heard United States of America v. Jayde Mucklow?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Wyoming (Laramie County), WY. The presiding judge was Scott W. Skavdahl.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Jayde Mucklow?
Plaintiff's attorney: Stephanie Sprecher. Defendant's attorney: Tom Smith.
When was United States of America v. Jayde Mucklow decided?
This case was decided on March 4, 2016.