Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
J.K. FRANKS AND EVA D. FRANKS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLANTS, v. HELEN L.TYLER ET AL., APPELLEES.
Date: 11-12-1974
Case Number: 1974 OK CIV App 55
Judge: Box
Court: Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals on appeal from the District Court of Washington County
Plaintiff's Attorney: Allan H. Stocker
Defendant's Attorney: Jim T. Tice
¶2 Plaintiffs J.K. Franks and Eva D. Franks, own forty acres of land in Washington County one boundary of which adjoins the section line. This property is completely surrounded by a ranch owned by the defendants Helen L. Tyler and her children, under which the other defendants John Hughes and Dan Gallery by some agreement, the terms of which are unknown to the plaintiffs, are in possession. The plaintiffs have been denied access to their property along the road which follows the section line except by permission of the defendants who claim that to the extent that this way can be called a road that it is a private road across their land and subject to their control. The plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin the defendants from interfering with their access along the section line road alleging that this road was a public road or had become a public road. In the alternative they sought to condemn a way of necessity under 27 O.S. 1971 § 6 . After a trial to the court all relief was denied to the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs were enjoined from trespassing on the defendants' property. Plaintiffs took this appeal.
* * *
¶11 Affirmed in part, reversed in part for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
¶12 Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
About This Case
What was the outcome of J.K. FRANKS AND EVA D. FRANKS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLAN...?
The outcome was: ¶10 Defendants concede in brief that the injunction in their favor against trespassing by the plaintiffs should be vacated "if the trial court is reversed, either on the question of whether the section line is a public road or on the question of Appellants' right to condemn." The trial court will therefore vacate this injunction upon remand. ¶11 Affirmed in part, reversed in part for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. ¶12 Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Which court heard J.K. FRANKS AND EVA D. FRANKS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLAN...?
This case was heard in Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals on appeal from the District Court of Washington County, OK. The presiding judge was Box.
Who were the attorneys in J.K. FRANKS AND EVA D. FRANKS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLAN...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Allan H. Stocker. Defendant's attorney: Jim T. Tice.
When was J.K. FRANKS AND EVA D. FRANKS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLAN... decided?
This case was decided on November 12, 1974.