Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Florence R. Groseclose v. Luetta Rice
Date: 10-24-1961
Case Number: 1961 OK 251
Judge: W.P. Keen
Court: District Court, Harmon County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Hollis Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Hollis Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory
Description:
Hollis, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a probate matter.
Luetta Rice, hereafter referred to as proponent, filed in the County Court of Harmon County a petition to probate the will of Joseph L. Sherrill who died in that county on February 12, 1960. Florence R. Groseclose, hereafter referred to as contestant, filed a petition for contest of the will. The county court dismissed the probate for lack of jurisdiction, stating that Sherrill was not at the time of his death a resident of Harmon County. Proponent appealed to the District Court of Harmon County which court reversed the decision of the county court and remanded the matter to county court for further proceedings. This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court and from an order overruling motion for new trial.
Syllabus by the Court:
" To effect change of residence or domicile, there must be actual abandonment of first domicile, coupled with intention not to return to it, and there must be a new domicile acquired by actual residence in another place or jurisdiction, with intention of making the last acquired residence a permanent home. "
Luetta Rice, hereafter referred to as proponent, filed in the County Court of Harmon County a petition to probate the will of Joseph L. Sherrill who died in that county on February 12, 1960. Florence R. Groseclose, hereafter referred to as contestant, filed a petition for contest of the will. The county court dismissed the probate for lack of jurisdiction, stating that Sherrill was not at the time of his death a resident of Harmon County. Proponent appealed to the District Court of Harmon County which court reversed the decision of the county court and remanded the matter to county court for further proceedings. This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court and from an order overruling motion for new trial.
Syllabus by the Court:
" To effect change of residence or domicile, there must be actual abandonment of first domicile, coupled with intention not to return to it, and there must be a new domicile acquired by actual residence in another place or jurisdiction, with intention of making the last acquired residence a permanent home. "
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Florence R. Groseclose v. Luetta Rice?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard Florence R. Groseclose v. Luetta Rice?
This case was heard in District Court, Harmon County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was W.P. Keen.
Who were the attorneys in Florence R. Groseclose v. Luetta Rice?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Hollis Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Hollis Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory.
When was Florence R. Groseclose v. Luetta Rice decided?
This case was decided on October 24, 1961.