Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States v. Wong Kim Ark

Date: 12-31-1898

Case Number: 159 U.S. 649

Judge: Gray (author), Brewer, Brown, Shiras, White, Peckham

Court: United States Supreme Court

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Washington, D.C. Constitutional Law Lawyer Directory





Defendant's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Washington, D.C. Constitutional Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Washington, D.C.: Ratified in 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment opens with the Citizenship Clause. It reads, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” The Supreme Court addressed the meaning of this key provision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Wong Kim Ark was born in San Francisco to parents who were both Chinese citizens. At age 21, he took a trip to China to visit his parents. When he returned to the United States, he was denied entry on the ground that he was not a U.S. citizen. In a 6-to-2 decision, the Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark. Because he was born in the United States and his parents were not "employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China,” the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment automatically made him a U.S. citizen. This case highlighted a disagreement between the Justices over the precise meaning of one key phrase in the Citizenship Clause: "subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”



Outcome:
For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States v. Wong Kim Ark?

The outcome was: For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.

Which court heard United States v. Wong Kim Ark?

This case was heard in United States Supreme Court, DC. The presiding judge was Gray (author), Brewer, Brown, Shiras, White, Peckham.

Who were the attorneys in United States v. Wong Kim Ark?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Washington, D.C. Constitutional Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Washington, D.C. Constitutional Law Lawyer Directory.

When was United States v. Wong Kim Ark decided?

This case was decided on December 31, 1898.