Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 08-21-2026

Case Number: 1:24-cv-00148

Judge: Not Available

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (Milwaukee County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Lindsey Roberts, Michael Carter and Nina Herring

Defendant's Attorney: Not Available

Description:
Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Mobile, Alabama United States District Attorney's offices sued Continental Aerospace Technologies Inc. on a False Claims Act violation theory claiming that submitting false claims to obtain a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan for which it was not eligible.

Reported by: Kent Morlan

Continental designs and manufactures aircraft engines and parts. At the time it applied for its PPP loan, it was part of a large multinational corporation partially owned by Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC). AVIC is wholly owned by the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC), an arm of the People’s Republic of China.

In applying for its PPP loan, Continental certified that it was eligible for the PPP. The United States alleges that Continental was not eligible because it was affiliated with other companies in the United States and China, and together with its affiliates across the globe, Continental employed more individuals than permitted by SBA’s size standard for its industry. The United States also contends that Continental was not eligible because it was ultimately owned by a government entity in violation of SBA rules.
Outcome:
The civil settlement includes the resolution of claims brought under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private parties to file an action on behalf of the United States and receive a portion of any recovery. The lawsuits were filed by GNGH2 Inc. in the Eastern District of Wisconsin and Andrew McCarley in the Southern District of Alabama. In connection with the settlement, GNGH2 Inc. will receive $1,765,902.02.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of ?

The outcome was: The civil settlement includes the resolution of claims brought under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private parties to file an action on behalf of the United States and receive a portion of any recovery. The lawsuits were filed by GNGH2 Inc. in the Eastern District of Wisconsin and Andrew McCarley in the Southern District of Alabama. In connection with the settlement, GNGH2 Inc. will receive $1,765,902.02.

Which court heard ?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (Milwaukee County), WI. The presiding judge was Not Available.

Who were the attorneys in ?

Plaintiff's attorney: Lindsey Roberts, Michael Carter and Nina Herring. Defendant's attorney: Not Available.

When was decided?

This case was decided on August 21, 2026.