Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

In Re: Joe Feijoo

Date: 03-18-2020

Case Number: 08-19-00314-CR

Judge: YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ

Court: COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

Plaintiff's Attorney: Hon. Jaime E. Esparza

Defendant's Attorney:



Need help finding a lawyer for representation for alleging that the trial court had no jurisdiction to convict him of any criminal charges because an assistant district attorney had declined to prosecute him on another charge in 1991 in Texas?



Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.







Description:





MoreLaw Suites









Virtual Offices of Solo Practice Lawyers Starting at $200 a Month

Office With MoreLaw Suites and Reduce Your Overhead





918-582-3993 - Info@MoreLaw.com







Relator Joe Feijoo, a pro se inmate, has filed a mandamus petition against the 205th District

Court, alleging that the trial court had no jurisdiction to convict him of any criminal charges

because an assistant district attorney had declined to prosecute him on another charge in 1991.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Generally, mandamus relief is appropriate only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or to

compel the performance of a ministerial duty, and where the relator has no adequate remedy by

appeal. In re Reece, 341 S.W.3d 360, 364 (Tex. 2011)(orig. proceeding). The burden is on relator

to show it is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Ford Motor Company, 165 S.W.3d 315, 317

(Tex. 2005)(orig. proceeding). After reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we conclude

that Relator has failed to show that he is entitled to mandamus relief.
Outcome:
Accordingly, we deny thepetition for writ of mandamus.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of In Re: Joe Feijoo?

The outcome was: Accordingly, we deny thepetition for writ of mandamus.

Which court heard In Re: Joe Feijoo?

This case was heard in COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS, TX. The presiding judge was YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ.

Who were the attorneys in In Re: Joe Feijoo?

Plaintiff's attorney: Hon. Jaime E. Esparza. Defendant's attorney: Need help finding a lawyer for representation for alleging that the trial court had no jurisdiction to convict him of any criminal charges because an assistant district attorney had declined to prosecute him on another charge in 1991 in Texas? Call 918-582-6422. It's Free..

When was In Re: Joe Feijoo decided?

This case was decided on March 18, 2020.