|
|
Eugene, Oregon personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendants on prisoner civil rights theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
|
Portland, Oregon personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant claiming that her civil rights were violated by Defendants. |
Gold Medal, LLC, d/b/a Run Gum v. USA Track & Field; United States Olympic Committee
District of Oregon Federal Courthouse - Portland, Oregon |
Appellant Gold Medal LLC d/b/a Run Gum (Run Gum) |
Sarah Meyer and Gail Wooldridge v. State of Oregon
Marion County Courthouse - Salem, Oregon |
Plaintiffs, Sarah Meyer and Martin Wooldridge, appeal from a general judgment dismissing their action against defendants Oregon State Lottery (the Lottery), Jill Goldsmith, Larry Niswender, Tessa Sugahara, John Kroger, and Craig Durbin.1 Plaintiffs assert five assignments of error. We reject plaintiffs fourth assignment of error without written discussion and write only to address their remaining... More... $0 (07-05-2018 - OR) |
Janell Howard v. City of Coos Bay
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Courthouse - San Francisco, California |
We must decide whether the former employee of a City in Oregon may prevail on allegations that it violated the First Amendment and state law by refusing to rehire her. |
Jeffrey Dale Tiner v. Jeff Premo |
Petitioner was found guilty by a jury of two counts |
Dylan Robbins v. City of Medford |
Plaintiff was seriously injured when he was hit by |
Lillian Figueroa v. BNSF Railroad Company |
Oregon requires that foreign corporations doing |
State Of Oregon v. Clemente-Perez |
In reviewing a denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal, we describe the pertinent facts and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from those facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Walker, 356 Or 4, 6, 333 P3d 316 (2014). In this case, defendants son and estranged wife went to defendants house to pick up his sons backpack before school. While defendants wife and son... More... $0 (09-17-2015 - OR) |
Tyler Turner v. State of Oregon |
Judgment in favor of the State of Oregon and City of |
State of Oregon v. Paul A. Spieler |
Defendant, who was convicted after a jury trial of |
Bobbi Klutschkowski v. Peacehealth |
Plaintiffs brought this medical malpractice action to recover for injuries that their son sustained during delivery. |
Kawi Fung Wong v. David V. Beebe |
We agreed to hear this case en banc to clarify whether the |
Ashley Schutz v. La Costita, III, Inc. |
2 After drinking past the point of intoxication at defendant's bar, plaintiff |
Jean Marie Howell v. Christopher David Boyle |
2 This case is before the court on certified questions of Oregon law from the 3 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit). See generally ORS 4 28.200 to 28.255 (granting authority to answer certified questions and describing 5 procedure). The questions arise out of an action for personal injury brought in federal 6 district court against defendant Boyle and his employer,... More... $0 (03-15-2013 - OR) |
Jaswinder Singh v. Terence S. McLaughlin |
2 Plaintiff, who ran a convenience store, was accused of stealing from that |
OSU Student Alliance v. Ed Ray |
The complaint alleges that employees in Oregon State University’s Facilities Department gathered up the outdoor newsbins belonging to the Liberty, a conservative student monthly, and threw them in a heap by a dumpster in a storage yard. The employees acted pursuant to an unwritten and previously unenforced policy governing newsbins on campus. They did not notify anyone at the Liberty before conf... More... $0 (10-24-2012 - OR) |
Michael Moss v. United States Secret Service |
During the 2004 presidential campaign, Plaintiff-Appellees, Michael Moss and others who opposed President Bush (“protestors” or “anti-Bush protestors”), organized a demonstration at a campaign stop in Jacksonville, Oregon. They contend that Secret Service agents, Defendant-Appellants Tim Wood and Rob Savage (“agents” or “Secret Service agents”), engaged in unconstitutional viewpoin... More... $0 (04-09-2012 - OR) |
Katherine Denucci v. J. Henningsen |
2 Plaintiff brought a civil action against Washington County Deputy Sheriff |
Antonio Cortez v. NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. |
2 Plaintiff appeals from a limited judgment dismissing with prejudice all of |
Hope Glenn v. Washington County |
Eighteen-year-old Lukus Glenn was shot and killed in his driveway by Washington County police officers. His mother had called 911 for help with her distraught and intoxicated son after Lukus began threatening to kill himself with a pocketknife and breaking household property. Within four minutes of their arrival, officers had shot Lukus with a “less-lethal” beanbag shotgun, and had fatally sho... More... $0 (12-27-2011 - OR) |
Erin Smith v. Bend Metropolitan Park and Recreation Board |
2 While running to prevent a child from falling into the water at a city |
Hope Green v. Washington County |
Eighteen-year-old Lukus Glenn was shot and killed in his driveway by Washington County police officers. His mother had called 911 for help with her distraught and intoxicated son after Lukus began threatening to kill himself with a pocketknife and breaking household property. Within four minutes of their arrival, officers had shot Lukus with a “less-lethal” beanbag shotgun, and had fatally sho... More... $0 (11-04-2011 - OR) |
Farmers Insurance Company of Orgeon v. Tosha K. Mowry |
2 This case concerns the proper application of stare decisis and requires us to |
Diane L. Scott v. Jackson County |
2 Plaintiff conducted a rabbit breeding operation on property located in |
Richard Abraham v. T. Henry Construction |
This case requires us to address an issue left open in Harris v. Suniga, 344 Or 301, 313, 180 P3d 12 (2008): Whether a claim for property damage arising from construction defects may lie in tort, in addition to contract, when the homeowner and builder are in a contractual relationship. Plaintiffs hired defendants(1) to build their house. Plaintiffs eventually discovered extensive water damage to t... More... $0 (03-10-2011 - OR) |
Randall J. Stewart v. Norman Kralman |
Plaintiff was severely injured while riding his snowmobile on defendant's land. Plaintiff appeals a judgment that dismissed his negligence action on summary judgment on alternative theories. First, the trial court concluded that defendant was immune from liability under ORS 105.682(1) because plaintiff's injuries arose out of his use of defendant's land for a recreational purpose. Second, the tria... More... $0 (02-02-2011 - OR) |
John Paul Brehm v. Caterpillar, Inc., et al. |
Plaintiffs, John Brehm (Brehm) and his wife, Mishel Brehm, appeal a limited judgment dismissing with prejudice their negligence, Oregon Employer Liability Law, and loss of consortium claims against defendant Copeland Sand & Gravel, Inc.(1) They assign error to the trial court's granting of defendant's motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs' claims were barred by the exclusive l... More... $0 (05-12-2010 - OR) |
Joseph S. Livingston v. Metropolitan Pediatrics, L.L.C.; Heather M. Moore, M.D.; Dean A. Moshofsky, M.D.; Karen H. Lickteig, M.D.; Gwynneth G. Neace, D.O.: Ricahrd Barsotti, M.D.; Gaile A. Rydell, M.D.; Catherine Thomas; PMP; Karen Heichelheim; Mary Kay Brady; and Nicole Huyck, aka Nichole Powers |
Plaintiff brought common-law claims against defendants for wrongful discharge, breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and intentional interference with economic relations, and brought statutory claims of employment discrimination, ORS 659A.230 (whistleblowing),(1) and blacklisting, ORS 659.805.(2) This is an interlocutory appeal of an order denying defendants' motion t... More... $0 (03-03-2010 - OR) |
Kennth Ackerman v. OHSU Medical Group |
Plaintiff was injured as the result of treatment he received while a patient at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU). He brought this action against two of his physicians as well as OHSU and OHSU Medical Group (Medical Group), the latter two in their capacity as the physicians' employers. A jury returned a verdict in favor of one of the physicians, but found that the other, West, was negl... More... $0 (02-10-2010 - OR) |
Sara Greene v. Bob Camreta |
We are asked to decide whether the actions of a child protective services caseworker and deputy sheriff, understandably concerned for the well-being of two young girls, exceeded the bounds of the constitution. Specifically, the girls’ mother, Sarah Greene, alleges, on behalf of S.G., one of her children, that the caseworker, Bob Camreta, and deputy sheriff, James Alford, violated the Fourth Amen... More... $0 (12-11-2009 - OR) |
Darrel L. Bouy v. Soo Hee Kim and Enjua Connie Kim |
This case concerns a landlord's liability for harm to a tenant's guest caused by the dangerous condition of a tenant improvement to leased property. Plaintiff was seriously injured when he fell while descending stairs to the entrance of a manufactured dwelling. The dwelling was situated in a leased space in a mobile home park. Plaintiff filed negligence claims against Archuleta, the owner of th... More... $0 (11-18-2009 - OR) |
Mike Kelly v. Samuel Israel Hochberg |
This is a legal malpractice action in which plaintiff contends that defendant, his former attorney, negligently handled his personal injury action by failing to assert claims against the owner of the land where the injury occurred. The trial court concluded that the owner of the land was immune from liability for injuries that arose out of the use of its property for recreational purposes and tha... More... $0 (10-07-2009 - OR) |
Bradley Coleman v. Oregon Parks and Recreation Department |
A landowner is immune from suit for injuries that arise out of the recreational use of its land when the owner "permits any person to use the land for recreational purposes[.]" ORS 105.682(1). However, that immunity applies only if the landowner "makes no charge for permission to use the land[.]" ORS 105.688(2)(a). In this action for injuries arising out of plaintiffs' use of a state park, the... More... $0 (10-07-2009 - OR) |
Alfred P. Viado v. Domino's Pizza, LLC |
In 2005, plaintiff was injured when his motorcycle collided with a vehicle driven by Mathias, a pizza delivery driver.(1) At the time of the accident, Mathias was employed by and was delivering pizzas for Zzeeks Pizza & Wings, Inc. (Zzeeks), doing business as one of approximately 4,500 franchises of Domino's Pizza, LLC (Domino's). Plaintiff subsequently filed this negligence action against Mathi... More... $0 (09-02-2009 - OR) |
Araceli Cardenas (Castellano) v. Farmers Insurance Company |
Defendant Farmers Insurance Company appeals a supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees to plaintiff, its insured, after plaintiff prevailed in an action for payment of uninsured motorist (UM) benefits. Plaintiff cross-appeals, seeking additional fees. The question before us on appeal is whether a dispute concerning the enforceability of a release is an issue that relates only to "damages"; i... More... $0 (08-20-2009 - OR) |
Cheryl Vaughn v. First Transit, Inc., et al. |
The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. |
Capital Credit & Collection Services, Inc. v. Fariba T. Armani fka Fariba T. Robinson |
Plaintiff Capital Credit & Collection Services, Inc., a debt collector, brought this action to collect $3,990.57 in principal, interest, and attorney fees on a guaranty of a student loan that defendant signed for a friend, Armani. (1) Plaintiff alleged that it had been assigned a claim for the principal of the loan by the creditor, United States National Bank (US Bank). Defendant's amended answe... More... $0 (04-22-2009 - OR) |
Cecilia L. Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc. |
We must decide whether the Communications Decency Act of 1996 protects an internet service provider from suit where it undertook to remove from its website material harmful to the plaintiff but failed to do so. |
Gregory A. Hughes v. Keith L. Wilson, Wasco County Public Works Department and Wasco County |
In this case, we consider a county's claim of immunity from civil liability under ORS 30.265(3)(c), Oregon's discretionary immunity statute. |