Oregon Garnishment Law
 

Robert Law v. Ronald Zemp

Oregon Supreme Court Building - Eugene, Oregon

This review proceeding arises out of a post-judgment
order charging a judgment debtor’s interests in four limited
partnerships and a limited liability company to satisfy the
judgment creditor’s judgment against him. The charging
order was issued over the limited partnerships’ and limited
liability company’s objections that ancillary provisions
included in the charging order... More...
   $0 (01-11-2018 - OR)

A&T Siding, Inc. v. Capitol Specialty Ins. Corp.

The Brownstone Homes Condominium Association discovered defects in the construction of its 26-building condominium complex, including wood decay, flashing delamination, and water penetration. In consequence, Brownstone initiated a negligence action against the general contractor who built the complex, as well as one of its subcontractors, A&T Siding. Brownstone estimated that A&T’s share of the co... More...    $0 (10-09-2015 - OR)

Brownstone Homes Condo. Assn. v. Brownstone Forest Hts.

Defendant Capitol Specialty Insurance Co. has moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that it has become moot. According to Capitol, the issues to be decided in the appeal pertain to the terms of an agreement settling an underlying construction defect case, but those very terms have been superseded by amendments to the agreement adopted during the pendency of the appeal. We conclude that, becau... More...    $0 (10-09-2015 - OR)

In the Matter of the Marriage of James R. Herald vn Dixie L. Steadman

Husband appeals from a judgment of dissolution
of marriage, arguing that the court erred in dividing
the parties’ retirement benefits, and, specifically, in its
treatment of wife’s federal Civil Service Retirement System
(CSRS) benefits. In particular, husband asserts that the
trial court’s apportionment methodology (described in
detail below) violated 42 USC section ... More...
   $0 (04-24-2013 - OR)

Estrelia Saldivar v. Ken Roberts

In this civil action alleging claims of fraud, misrepresentation, conversion, and unfair labor practices, plaintiff appeals an order of the trial court setting aside a general judgment and order of default on the ground of excusable neglect. ORCP 71 B(1)(a). Plaintiff contends that the undisputed facts do not support the conclusion that defendants' default was the result of excusable neglect. We r... More...    $0 (01-12-2011 - OR)

MAN Aktiengesellschaft, et al. v. DaimlerChrysler, AG, et al.

The state is not a party to the underlying dispute between plaintiffs and defendants in this case but asserts that it has an interest under ORS 31.735 in the jury's award of punitive damages. The state has appealed from a supplemental judgment dismissing the case that the trial court entered as part of a settlement between plaintiffs and defendants. As part of entering the supplemental judgment, t... More...    $0 (03-11-2008 - OR)

Ray Klein, Inc. v. Brady Preheim

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered after the filing of an arbitrator's decision and award following court-annexed mandatory arbitration pursuant to ORS 36.400 et seq. ORS 36.425(1). Defendants also assign error to the trial court's post-judgment order denying their motion to quash garnishment and to the court's supplemental judgment for sanctions pursuant to ORS 20.105. We conclude that: (1... More...    $0 (11-14-2001 - OR)

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher
array(8) { [0]=> string(2) "37" ["id"]=> string(2) "37" [1]=> string(2) "OR" ["state1"]=> string(2) "OR" [2]=> string(6) "Oregon" ["state2"]=> string(6) "Oregon" [3]=> string(0) "" ["state3"]=> string(0) "" }