Oklahoma Injunction Law

<h2> <center> State of Oklahoma v. Randall Keith Doyal </h2> </center>

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stalking in violation of 21 O.S. 1173, which provides: A. Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person in a manner that: 1. Would cause a reasonable person or a member of the immediate family of that person as defined in subsection F of this section to feel frightened, ... More...

$ (07-15-2026 - OK)

<H2> Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Steve Kunzweiler

Tulsa, Oklahoma Indian law lawyers filed suit on behalf of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation seeking an injunction prohibiting the States of Oklahoma from prosecuting Native Americans accused of committing crimes in the Creek Reservation.... More...

$ (12-30-2025 - OK)

The Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, et al. v. Gentner Drummond, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma Indian Law lawyers represented The Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, The Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma, The Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, and the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma seeking an injunction.... More...

$0 (03-21-2023 - OK)

Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law & Justice v. Tulsa County Juvenile Bureau and Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners

Tulsa, Oklahoma social justice lawyers represented the Plaintiff seeking public records. PETITION: COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, Inc., ("Plaintiff'), and brings this action against Defendants, Tulsa County Juvenile Bureau ("Bureau'2.); and Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC"), for violations of the Oklahoma: Open ... More...

$0 (12-03-2024 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. A.M.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: STALKING, in violation of 21 O.S. 1173: A. Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person in a manner that: 1. Would cause a reasonable person or a member of the immediate family of that person as defined in subsection F of this section to feel fr... More...

$0 (07-22-2025 - OK)

Joshua Lamle, et al. v. Susan Eads, et al.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on wrongful denial of Medicaid benefits. Two elderly individuals (Ms. Penelope Lamle and Ms. Maxine Houston) sued based on alleged irregularities in the processing of their Medicaid applications. 1 In their suit, the applicants sought ï‚· an injunction ordering an expedited decision and payment of Medicaid benefit... More...

$0 (04-09-2025 - OK)

United States of America v. Joshua Price, IV

<h2> Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cyberstalking in violation of 18 U.S.C.2261, which provides: (a) Offenses.â€” (1) Travel or conduct of offender.â€” A person who travels in interstate or foreign commerce or enters or leaves Indian country or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the U... More...

$0 (12-12-2024 - OK)

Eric J. Graham v. Adam S. Reynolds

<h2> Jay, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a real property law dispute. </h2> Plaintiff's December 22, 2020 Amended Petition sought declaratory and injunctive relief from the district court, asking for a declaration that Reynolds' short-term vacation rental of his lakefront property violated the housing addition restrictive covenants against "commercial... More...

$0 (11-25-2024 - OK)

Shelli Farley v. City of Claremore </centr>

<h2> Claremore, Oklahoma worngful death personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Government Tort Claims Act negligence theory. </h2> Surviving spouse of a former fireman for the City of Claremore filed a petition in the District Court of Rogers County against the City of Claremore. Surviving spouse sought damages for wrongful death and an injunction against the City of Cla... More...

$0 (04-05-2020 - OK)

Robert H. Braver v. Clear Sky Financial, LLC

<h2> Oklahoma City, Oklahoma consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory. </h2> 47 U.S.C. 227 provides: As used in this sectionâ€” (1) The term "automatic telephone dialing systemâ€ means equipment which has the capacityâ€” (A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, us... More...

$0 (07-24-2024 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. D.R.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with stalking in violation of 21 O.S. 1173 and being a peeping tom in violation of 21 O.S. 1171. 21 O.S. 1173 provides: A. Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person in a manner that: 1. Would cause a reasonable person or a member of the immediate famil... More...

$0 (03-25-2024 - OK)

United States of America v. Tyler James Stephens

Muskogee, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with stalking, attempted first degree burglary in Indian Country, attempted sexual abuse, first degree burglary and coercion and enticement. 18 U.S.C. 1151 provides: Except as otherwise provided in sections 1154 and 1156 of this title, the term "Indian countryâ€, as used in this chapter, means (a) ... More...

$0 (08-03-2023 - OK)

Noah Lebowitz v. Harmoney Nutraceuticals, LLC

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114, which provides: (1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrantâ€” (a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale... More...

$0 (04-26-2023 - OK)

Brian and Janelle Shellem v. Angela Gruneweld, et al.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma education law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who challenged school quarantine policy. ¶1 During the summer of 2021, Appellants, Edmond Public School Board Members and Edmond Public School District Superintendent, Angela Grunewald, (collectively "District") anticipated a complete return to in-person instruction for the 2021-2022 school year. Prior to the start ... More...

$0 (03-28-2023 - OK)

Just Between Friends Franchise System, Inc. v. Samone Gibson Enterprises, LLC et al

Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory. 15 U.S.C. 1114 provides: (1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrantâ€” (a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distrib... More...

$0 (03-29-2023 - OK)

Oklahoma Call of Reproductive Justice v. Drummond

¶1 The Petitioners consist of healthcare providers, Tulsa Women's Reproductive Clinic, LLC, Alan Braid, M.D., Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma and an advocacy group, the Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice. The Respondents consist of the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, the district attorneys of Oklahoma ... More...

$0 (03-23-2023 - OK)

United States of America v. Qualgen LLC, et al.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Defendants accused of manufacturing and distributing drugs that are not in compliance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). <table> <h1> <center> <a font="red" href="https://www.morelaw.com/oklahoma/news/oklahomacity/" target="_new">MoreLaw Legal News For Oklahoma City</a> </center> </h... More...

$0 (12-19-2022 - OK)

Crystal Bay Estates Homeowners Association v. Sarah Fox and James Cox

Pawhuska, Oklahoma condo law lawyer represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendants seeking injunctive relief. ¶1 Defendants Sarah and James Cox (the Coxes) appeal from a temporary injunction issued by the district court restraining them from continuing construction on their tract of land. Based on our review, we affirm the temporary injunction. BACKGROUND ¶2 In November ... More...

$0 (11-09-2022 - OK)

Arnold H. Johnson v. Dirk M. Snow

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma family law lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendant in a dispute over deceased wife's assets. While divorce proceedings between Plaintiff/Appellee Arnold H. Johnson (Husband) and Jacquelyn K. Johnson (Wife) were pending, Wife changed the primary beneficiary of her individual retirement account (IRA) from Husband to her adult children, Defendants/Appellants Dirk ... More...

$0 (11-01-2022 - OK)

Pizza Inn, Inc. v. Fawzi Odetallah

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendant in a breach of franchise agreement dispute. In 2007, Pizza Inn and Mr. Odetallah entered into a franchise agreement ("2007 Franchise Agreementâ€), granting Mr. Odetallah a non-exclusive license to use Pizza Inn's proprietary trademarks in connection with the restaurant located at 2224 North 14th Stre... More...

$0 (09-26-2022 - OK)

Monster Technology Group, LLC v. Garrett A. Eller

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights violation theory. Monster believes the Iowa Tribe breached a contract with it that concerned development of software for online gaming operations. Monster therefore filed a petition for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association (AAA). The Iowa Tribe contends... More...

$0 (07-29-2022 - OK)

William H. Morgan, III v. Justin Brown, et al.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaitniff, who sued Defendants seeking a declaratory judgment under 42 U.S.C. 1983, that he is eligible for Medicaid benefits. William H. Morgan III (Morgan) is an 88-year-old resident of the Community Health Center located in Wakita, Oklahoma. He was admitted to the nursing facility in February of 2015.[2] Several months prior... More...

$0 (07-05-2022 - OK)

Optimum Lab Services, LLC and Pediatric Allergy Solutions, LLC v. Alpha Medical Laboratory, LLC, Cogent Medical Laboratory, LLC, RRG Enterprises, LLC, Robert Edwin Gates, Nathan Gates, and Rita Rodrigues

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued defendants on breach of contract theories. On October 1, 2020, Defendant Cogent sold a medical laboratory to plaintiff. It was the intent of Plaintiff that it would continue Cogent's business. Plaintiff claimed that Gates breached the agreement by creating a competing laboratory, Alpha Medical Laboratory. Plaintiffs... More...

$1518948 (06-07-2022 - OK)

FLOYD MANAR and MARGIE M. MANAR, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Appellees/Counter-Appellants, v. JAMES H. WESSON and JAMIE WESSON, Defendants/Counter-Claimants/Appellants/Counter-Appellees.

¶1 Defendants/Counter-Claimants/Appellants/Counter-Appellees James H. and Jamie Wesson appeal from judgment finding Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Appellees/Counter-Appellants Floyd and Margie M. Manar have an easement by prescription to use a roadway crossing property owned by the Wessons. The Manars appeal the trial court's finding that the road is not a public road. The clear weight of the evid... More...

$0 (05-04-2016 - OK)

J.K. FRANKS AND EVA D. FRANKS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLANTS, v. HELEN L.TYLER ET AL., APPELLEES.

¶1 An appeal by plaintiffs from the trial court's granting of a permanent injunction, enjoining plaintiffs from trespassing upon defendants' section line property and the denying of plaintiffs' alternative petition to condemn part of the section line as a private road as a way of necessity to a tract of land purchased by plaintiffs in 1970. ¶2 Plaintiffs J.K. Franks and Eva D. Franks, o... More...

$0 (11-12-1974 - OK)

Farm Credit Bank of Wichita v. Woodring

¶0 The appellants, Farm Credit Bank of Wichita and Citizens Bank of Wakita (collectively, Banks) made loans to the Cecelia Simons Trust (Trust). The loans were secured by first and second mortgages on Trust real estate. The Trust defaulted, and the Banks began foreclosure proceedings. Thereafter, the Trustees conveyed two unencumbered tracts of real estate to trust beneficiaries, leaving the Trus... More...

$0 (04-27-1993 - OK)

Richard Gore Betty Tayor, et al.

¶1 The dispositive issue presented for review in this abuse of process action filed by the counterclaimants is whether the third-party plaintiff's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence should have been sustained and a verdict directed for the third-party plaintiff. ¶2 We answer in the affirmative and reverse the judgment appealed. I ¶3 Underlying the lawsuit - ... More...

$0 (07-27-2021 - OK)

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. AKAASH MANI, Defendant.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: MS0S, STALKING, in violation of 21 O.S. 1173 Date of Offense: 06/03/2020 Party Name Disposition Information MANI, AKAASH Disposed: CONVICTION, 06/10/2021. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: STALKING(MS0S) Violation of 21 O.S. 1173, which provides: <b... More...

$0 (06-10-2021 - OK)

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. JARED WAYNE WILLIAMS, Defendant.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: MS0S, STALKING, in violation of 21 O.S. 1173 Date of Offense: 03/26/2020 Party Name Disposition Information WILLIAMS, JARED WAYNE Disposed: DISMISSED, 05/28/2021. Dismissed- Transferred to Another Jurisdiction Count as Disposed: STALKING(MS0S) Violation of 21 O.S... More...

$0 (05-28-2021 - OK)

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL EUGENE AUSTIN, Defendant.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: MS0S, STALKING, in violation of 21 O.S. 1173 Date of Offense: 03/04/2020 Party Name Disposition Information AUSTIN, MICHAEL EUGENE Disposed: DISMISSED, 05/27/2021. Dismissed- Prosecution Witness Failed to Appear Count as Disposed: STALKING(MS0S) Violation of 21 O... More...

$0 (05-27-2021 - OK)

Thomas James Hess, Jr. v. Luzangela Lievano Dehess v. City of Tulsa

Tulsa, Oklahoma declaratory judgment lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued the City of Tulsa seeking an injunction.... More...

$0 (01-11-2021 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. Shane Michael Glisson

Norman, OK - The State of Oklahoma charged Shane Michael Glisson with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: MS0S, STALKING VILATION VPO, in violation of 21 O.S. 1173 Date of Offense: 09/27/2017 Party Name Disposition Information Glisson, Shane Michael Disposed: CONVICTION, 07/29/2020. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: STALKING VILATION VPO(MS0S) Violation of 21 O.S. 1173, whic... More...

$0 (07-29-2020 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. Rodney Dale White

Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma charged Rodney Dale White with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: MS0S, STALKING, in violation of 21 O.S. 1173 Date of Offense: 12/01/2019 Party Name Disposition Information WHITE, RODNEY DALE Disposed: CONVICTION, 07/10/2020. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: STALKING(MS0S) Violation of 21 O.S. 1173 A. Any person who wi... More...

$0 (07-10-2020 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. Adrian Rashun Andrews

Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma charged Adrian Rashun Andrews with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: MS0S, STALKING, in violation of 21 O.S. 1173 Date of Offense: 02/24/2019 Party Name Disposition Information ANDREWS, ADRIAN RASHUN Disposed: CONVICTION, 06/17/2020. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: STALKING(MS0S) Violation of 21 O.S. 1173, which provides: <... More...

$0 (06-25-2020 - OK)

United States of America v. Jeffrey Scott Terry

<center><h1> 0em;"><a href="http://www.callmorelaw.com/" target="_new">MoreLaw Receptionists</a>VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services Call 918-582-6422 Today </h1></center> Oklahoma City, OK - The United States of America charged Jeffrey Scott Terry with health care... More...

$0 (05-21-2020 - OK)

ROBERT KIRK WAITS, individually, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. VIERSEN OIL & GAS CO., an Oklahoma corporation, Defendant/Appellant.

¶1 Viersen Oil and Gas Co. appeals a decision of the district court denying prevailing party fees after Plaintiff Robert Waits dismissed his claims. On review, we affirm the decision of the district court. BACKGROUND ¶2 This is the third time this case has reached the appellate courts. It springs from a compensation dispute between Waits and Vierson. In early 2011, Waits was fi... More...

$0 (01-15-2020 - OK)

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA DEAN JOHNSON, Defendant.

Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma charged Joshua Dean Johnson with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: MS0S, STALKING, in violation of 21 O.S. 1173 Date of Offense: 06/01/2019 Party Name Disposition Information JOHNSON, JOSHUA DEAN Disposed: DEFERRED, 01/14/2020. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: STALKING(MS0S) Violation of 21 O.S. 1173 A. Any person who w... More...

$0 (01-14-2020 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. Steven Michael Powers

Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma charged Steven Michael Powers with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: FSOD, FORCIBLE SODOMY, in violation of 21 O.S. 888 which provides: A. Any person who forces another person to engage in the detestable and abominable crime against nature, pursuant to Section 886 of this title, upon conviction, is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the ... More...

$0 (11-27-2019 - OK)

Central Surety & Insurance Corporation v. L.C. Kelley, et al.

¶1 This appeal by plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, is from an order dissolving a temporary injunction. The parties will be referred to by their trial court designation. ¶2 Plaintiff has issued a binder of fire insurance to defendant Kelley covering certain described vehicles. Defendants Arnote, Arnote, and Bratton are attorneys for defendant Kelley in an action against plaintiff tha... More...

$0 (05-20-1958 - OK)

Charles Edward Neil v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company

¶1 Plaintiffs Neil, Henderson, and Nordyke are former insurance agents or "supervisors" in Oklahoma of Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company, defendant. They quit working for the defendant and obtained employment as insurance agents for The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company filed an injunction suit against Neil, Henderson and Nordyke to prevent them from solici... More...

$0 (09-22-1970 - OK)