Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the parties in a Job Discrimination (Employment) 42 U.A.X. 2000e casa.

42 U.S.C. 2000e, also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It applies to employers, employment agencies, and labor organizations. This law makes it illegal to dis... More...    $0 (06-13-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers are representing the Plaintiffs on 42 U.S.C. 2000e job discrimination theories.


COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs Greta J. Hurt and Julie D. Lynn, ("Hurt" and "Lynn") allege:
1. This action is brought on behalf of the Plaintiffs to enforce the provisions of Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq. ("Title VII... More...    $0 (06-13-2025 - OK)

San Antonio, Texas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a job discrimination claim.

MoreLaw’s goal is to help people seeking legal assistance to find the best lawyers available to represent them in any county in the United States. Click the link above to see some lawyers available where this case was tried who might be available to represent you .Call 833-200-3094 if you ne... More...    $0 (09-16-2024 - OK)

Muskogee, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an employment discrimination theory.

Loretta Mauldin sued the Secretary of the United States Department of the Army, asserting claims of retaliation and discrimination on the basis of age under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and discrimination on the basis of sex under Title VI... More...    $0 (05-07-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an employment discrimination theory.... More...    $0 (04-01-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e, which provides, according to Google AI:

42 U.S.C. 2000e, also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits discrimination in employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
Key Aspects:

Prohibits Discrim... More...    $0 (02-03-2025 - OK)

Muskogee, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on race and sex discrmination and retaliation theories.

Marci Walkingstick Dixon worked at Northeastern State University (“NSU”).
Richard Reif was her supervisor. After NSU fired her, she sued NSU for Title VII
sex and race discrimination and Title VII retaliation. She sued Dr. Reif for
retaliation u... More...    $0 (01-14-2025 - OK)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on employment discrimination and retaliation theories.

Rodriguez worked for the postal service (USPS) beginning in 2003. At times
relevant to this appeal, in 2020–2021, he was a rural carrier at the Sooner Station post
office in Norman, Oklahoma.

* * *

Rodriguez then filed a formal EEO comp... More...    $0 (01-15-2025 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful termination theory.

Sondia Bell worked for the City of Tulsa’s Information and Technology (IT) department. Across twelve months, the City twice suspended her without pay and then it fired her. She sued, alleging that the City’s actions were
discriminatory and retaliatory. The City moved for sum... More...    $0 (01-14-2025 - OK)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a sex discrimination theory.

The district court dismissed Appellant Harold Rutila’s complaint alleging sex
discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and denied
his motion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
9(e).

* * *
Mr. Rut... More...    $0 (12-18-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.... More...    $1 (12-16-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyer James Osby Goodwin represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on job discrimination theories.... More...    $0 (05-29-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer Dustin Lane Compton represented the Plaintiff who sued on an Americans With Disabilities Act violation theory.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in several areas, including employment, ... More...    $1 (05-23-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers Daniel E. Smolen and Mark Allen Smith represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination race theory.

This case was initially filed in the Tul... More...    $0 (05-14-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer Dustain Lane Compton represented the Plaintiff who sued on an Americans With Disabilities Act violation theory.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in several areas, including employment,... More...    $0 (04-30-2024 - OK)

Muskogee, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a 42 U.S.C. 2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)theory.... More...    $0 (02-26-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on 42 U.S.C. 2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) theories.

It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer—
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges ... More...    $0 (02-23-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Family and Medical Leave Act employment discrimination theory.

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides certain employees with up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave per year. It also requires that their group health benefits be maintained during the leave.

FMLA is designed to help emplo... More...    $1 (02-19-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers presented the Plaintiff who sued on a 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race) theory.

It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer—

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of s... More...    $1 (02-22-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Defendant who sued on a job discrimination theory.

2000e et seq., makes it unlawful for a private employer or a state or local government “to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discrimi- nate against any individual with respect to his compen- sation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, b... More...    $1 (02-16-2024 - OK)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disability Act Violation theory.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in several areas, including employment, transportation, public accommodations, communications and access to state and local government' programs... More...    $1 (12-13-2023 - OK)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a job discrimination theory.

The Federal Arbitration Act is a federal statute, codified at 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16, that protects the integrity of many arbitration agreements by deeming them valid, irrevocable, and enforceable. As a result of this law, courts do not have the authority to set aside ... More...    $0 (01-26-2024 - OK)

Oklahoma city, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) violation theory.

2000e et seq., makes it unlawful for a private employer or a state or local government “to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discrimi- nate against any individual with respect to his compen- satio... More...    $0 (01-24-2024 - OK)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights violation lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a sex discrimination theory.

During her time as a student in a chaplain residency program at OU Medicine, Inc., Plaintiff claims that she was subjected to racial and sexual discrimination, emotional distress, harassment, retaliation, and constructively discharged. (Doc. No. 24). Plai... More...    $1 (11-13-2023 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment) theories under 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., which make it unlawful for a private employer or a state or local government “to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, ... More...    $1 (01-02-2024 - OK)