|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of New Jersey v Hakum Brown a/k/a Hakeem Brown and State of New Jersey v. Rodney Brown |
|
Trenton, NJ - Criminal defense attorney represented Rodney Brown and Hakum Brown with a sexual assault and sexual assault and endangering the welfare of a child charges.New Jersey’s law governing the sex offender registration and notification system, N.J.S.A. 2C:7-1 to -23, is commonly known as Megan’s Law, aft... More... $0 (02-09-2021 - NJ) |
|
State of New Jersey v. A.T.C |
|
Defendant was arrested and charged with possession and distribution of child pornography. D... More... $0 (02-04-2020 - NJ) |
|
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH MAGGIO
|
|
Defendant was arrested in 1983 in the State of New York on |
|
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BRANDON T. MORRISON center> |
|
Pemberton Township contracted with the Pemberton First Aid |
|
Brenda Ann Schwartz v. Accuratus Corporation | |
The issue in Olivo was whether a landowner can be liable |
|
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MALCOLM C. HAGANS | |
Defendant Malcolm C. Hagans appeals from a May 2, 2014 |
|
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ROBERTO BRYANT | |
On December 14, 2010, a Monmouth County grand jury indicted |
|
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. PETER RALLIS | |
The warrant was issued on April 30, 2012, based upon an |
|
Rudolph Laidlow v. Hariton Machinery Company, Inc. | |
The Workers' Compensation system has been described as an historic "trade-off" whereby employees relinquish their right to pursue common-law remedies in exchange for prompt and automatic entitlement to benefits for work-related injuries. Millison v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 101 N.J. 161, 174, 501 A.2d 505 (1985). That characterization is only broadly accurate. In fact, not every worker inj... More... $0 (02-25-2002 - NJ) |
|
State Of New Jersey v. Lloyd-Jones | |
We summarize the trial testimony. At about 2:30 a.m. on April 13, 2011, Officer Mathew Brescia was alone on patrol in the Township of Union. At a darkened gas station, he saw a Subaru Impreza wagon parked next to the gas pump, with Armerding standing next to the rear passenger side. Knowing the gas station was closed, Brescia pulled in and exited his patrol car. He saw the gas pump was illuminated... More... $0 (01-03-2016 - NJ) |
|
Hon. Dana L. Redd v. Vance Bowman | |
This appeal arises from a challenge by initiative to the |
|
Byron Halsey v. Frank Pfeiffer | |
The facts underlying this appeal—many of which are undisputed—are hardly believable. Plaintiff-Appellant, Byron Halsey, a young man with limited education, learned that the two small children for whom he had been caring had been tortured and murdered. He wanted to help in the investigation of these heinous crimes but found himself isolated in a police interview room, accused of the murders, to... More... $0 (04-24-2014 - NJ) |
|
Nowell James and Maryann James v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company | |
In Pinto v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co., 183 N.J. 405, 407 (2005), this Court enforced a commercial motor vehicle liability policy’s “step-down” provision, which had the effect of capping uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage (UM/UIM coverage) provided through an employer’s commercial policy to employees and other qualifying “insureds” at the |
|
American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice | |
This appeal concerns the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (“FBI”) response to appellant American Civil Liberties Union’s (“ACLU”) request for information under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2009). The ACLU claims that the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (“District Court”) erred in allowing the FBI to withhold 284 pages of... More... $0 (10-29-2013 - NJ) |
|
Ryan Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc. | |
In 2009, Appellant Ryan Hart (“Appellant” or “Hart”)1 brought suit against Appellee Electronic Arts, Inc. (“Appellee” or “EA”) for allegedly violating his right of publicity as recognized under New Jersey law. Specifically, Appellant‟s claims stemmed from Appellee‟s alleged use of his likeness and biographical information in its NCAA Football series of videogames. The District ... More... $0 (05-21-2013 - nj) |
|
Janet Henebema v. South Jersey Transportation Authority and New Jersey State Police | |
Defendants South Jersey Transportation Authority (SJTA) and the New Jersey State Police (NJSP) (collectively referred to as "defendants") appeal from a judgment in plaintiff Janet Henebema's favor, entered after a jury trial, and an order denying their motion for a remittitur. Plaintiff cross-appeals from an order denying her request for pre-judgment interest pursuant to Rule 4:58-2(a)(2).1 |
|
National Security Systems, Inc. v. Robert L. Iola, Jr. | |
We are called upon once again to address litigation arising out of a tax avoidance scheme devised in the late 1980s.1 Defendant James Barrett, a financial planner, induced the plaintiffs, four small New Jersey corporations and their respective owners, to adopt an employee welfare benefit plan known as the Employers Participating Insurance Cooperative (―EPIC‖). EPIC‘s advertised tax benefits,... More... $0 (11-08-2012 - NJ) |
|
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Ofra Dimant | |
Seeking contribution for costs expended in the investigation and remediation of contaminated groundwater that tainted private wells in Bound Brook, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and the Administrator of the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund (hereinafter collectively the DEP), filed this action under the Spill Compensation and Control Act (Spill Act or Act). Although the DE... More... $0 (09-26-2012 - NJ) |
|
Katherine Milne v. Robert Goldenberg | |
The parties appeal from four post-judgment orders in this highly contentious and litigious matrimonial matter. Plaintiff Katherine Milne challenges provisions set forth in Family Part orders dated March 10, 2011, March 23, 2011, and September 30, 2011, the latest of which was entered following our limited remand. Defendant Robert Goldenberg appeals from an April 29, 2011 order, which reallocated ... More... $0 (09-21-2012 - NJ) |
|
Mark W. Hagans v. Commissioners of Social Security | |
Mark Hagans appeals the cessation of his Social Security disability insurance benefits following a determination by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) that he was no longer disabled. Hagans argues the District Court erred by reviewing his disability status as of September 1, 2004 — the day on which, according to the SSA, Hagans’s disability ceased. This contention requires us to de... More... $0 (09-17-2012 - nj) |
|
Street Seafood, Inc. v. City of Wildwood | |
In this inverse condemnation action involving a property in a redevelopment zone, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant following a bench trial.1 Judge Michael Winkelstein found plaintiff's failure to file a redevelopment application for its property precluded its inverse condemnation claims and purported comments by individual municipal officials that no building permits would b... More... $0 (05-18-2012 - NJ) |
|
NEW PROVIDENCE APARTMENTS CO., L.L.C. v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE | |
A municipal governing body has the option of funding sanitary sewer services either from general municipal revenues obtained by real estate taxes or from fees imposed upon property owners who use the sewer system. If a governing body chooses to fund its sewer system through user fees, it must comply with the mandate of N.J.S.A. 40A:26A-10 that such "fees . . . shall be |
|
J.M.S. and G.S and S.S v. J.W. and E.W. | |
Plaintiffs, J.M.S. and his former wife, S.S., are the paternal grandparents of J.W., born in 1999, and T.W., born in 2001; G.S. is J.M.S.'s current wife. Defendants, J.W. and E.W., are the adoptive parents and are cousins of the children's biological mother, J.M.1 |
|
Amy Ryan v. Gina Marie, L.L.C. | |
Plaintiff is a tenant in a multi-unit building in Hoboken that is owned by defendant Gina Marie, L.L.C. ("Gina Marie"). Plaintiff secured her apartment with the assistance of a Hoboken real estate broker and has resided there since October 1993. Her initial rent when she took up occupancy was $650 per month. There is no indication in the record that plaintiff received any increase in her rent unti... More... $0 (06-07-2011 - NJ) |
|
Albert W. Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington | |
This interlocutory appeal requires us to decide whether it is constitutional for jails to strip search arrestees upon their admission to the general population. Although the question is one of first impression for this Court, the Supreme Court’s decision in Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979), and the many cases that followed it inform our analysis. |
|
Koral Moore v. Woman To Woman Obstetricas & Gynecology, L.L.C. | |
Plaintiffs Monica and Kevin Moore are the parents of Koral Moore, who has Down Syndrome. Due to Monica's age, her pregnancy was considered high risk. Her doctor, defendant Lisa Vernon, M.D., practicing with defendant Woman to Woman Obstetrics & Gynecology, L.L.C., referred Monica to defendants Carlos Fernandez, M.D., and Premier Perinatal, L.L.C. (Premier). Plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging me... More... $0 (08-21-2010 - NJ) |
|
Shana Faith Massachi v. City of Newark | |
|
|
Jackson Holdings, LLC v. Jackson Township Planning Board | |
|
|
Miriam Gonzalez v. New Jersey Property Liability Insurance Guaranty Association | |
In this appeal, we consider the validity of the National |
|
Jersey Schools Construction Corporation v. David Lopez | |
In this condemnation action involving property located at |
|
Joesph Donelson v. DuPont Chambers Works | |
This is an appeal by defendant DuPont Chambers Works from the denial of its post-trial motions after a jury awarded DuPont's former employee, plaintiff John Seddon, $724,000 as compensatory damages and $500,000 as punitive damages, based upon the jury's finding of a violation of plaintiff's rights under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -8. The entire amount of ... More... $0 (02-24-2010 - NJ) |
|
Fernando Roa and Lilian Roa v. LAFE and Marino Roa | |
At issue on this appeal are several questions centering on the operation of the two-year statute of limitations applicable to the antiretaliation provision of New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(d). In particular, we are asked to declare whether the statute of limitations bars a retaliation claim based both on an employee's discharge and on a post-discharge retaliatory ... More... $0 (01-14-2010 - NJ) |
|
Carl and Della Darst v. Blairstown Township Zoning Board | |
|
|
Joan Marino v. Larry L. Marino, Jr., et al. | |
This appeal, which comes before the Court as of right based on the opinion of the dissenting Appellate Division judge, requires the Court to interpret the provisions in the New Jersey Cemetery Act of 2003, N.J.S.A. 45:27-1 to -38, governing interment, N.J.S.A. 45:27-22, and disinterment, N.J.S.A. 45:27-23. Specifically, this dispute, between a decedent's surviving spouse and children about his fin... More... $0 (09-18-2009 - NJ) |
|
Deb Associates v. Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company | |
|
|
OFP, LLC v. The State of New Jersey | |
The Highlands Act provides for the regulation of development and land use planning in the Highlands Region, consisting of nearly 800,000 acres in eighty-eight municipalities located in parts of seven counties in north and central New Jersey. The Highlands Act creates two areas within the Region: a preservation area, in which further development is strictly regulated, and a planning area, in which ... More... $0 (12-09-2008 - NJ) |
|
New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, et al. v. New Jersey Department of Agriculture, et al. | |
In 1996, with little discernable fanfare, the Legislature enacted a new section of the existing statute regulating animal cruelty. Although that statute, since at least 1898, had essentially left animal welfare and the protection of animals to the New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (“NJSPCA”) and its related county organizations, the Legislature decreed that the Depart... More... $0 (07-30-2008 - NJ) |
|
Nilda Gutierrez, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson | |
Petitioners are former employees of Johnson & Johnson. They allege that Johnson & Johnson discriminated against them on the basis of their race. Petitioners attempted to certify a class of plaintiffs that encompassed any African- American or Hispanic employee of Johnson & Johnson or any of its United States subsidiaries who was employed at any time during an approximately ten-year period. Th... More... $0 (04-22-2008 - NJ) |