Baltimore, Maryland intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copy right infringement theory.

Strike 3 Holdings is a company that owns the copyright on some pornographic films. They produce adult films under the brand names Slayed,...

"Copyright infringement law is a body of law that protects the original works of authors, including lite... More...    $0 (11-13-2023 - MD)

MEYER, District Judge.

On September 21, 1987, Quality Inns International, Inc. announced a new chain of economy hotels to be marketed under the name "McSleep Inn." The response of McDonald's Corporation was immediate. It demanded by letter sent three days later that Quality International not use the name "McSleep" because it infringed on McDonald's family of marks that are characterized b... More...    $0 (09-16-1988 - MD)

This case presents the latest chapter in extensive litigation over the Baltimore Ravens “Flying Bâ€� logo. Frederick Bouchat challenges the National Football League’s use of the logo in three videos featured on its television network and various websites, as well as the Baltimore Ravens’ display of images that include the logo as part of exhibits in its stadium “Club Levelâ€� seating area.... More...    $0 (01-15-2014 - MD)

This case presents the latest chapter in extensive litigation over the Baltimore Ravens “Flying Bâ€� logo. Frederick Bouchat challenges the National Football League’s use of the logo in three videos featured on its television network and various websites, as well as the Baltimore Ravens’ display of images that include the logo as part of exhibits in its stadium “Club Levelâ€� seating area.... More...    $0 (12-17-2013 - MD)

For the fourth time we consider on appeal an aspect of Frederick E. Bouchat’s copyright infringement cause against the Baltimore Ravens football organization and National Football League entities for their unauthorized copying of a Ravens team logo, drawn by Bouchat, that was used for three seasons as the team’s official symbol. This appeal arises from an action Bouchat filed to enjoin defenda... More...    $0 (09-09-2010 - MD)

CoStar Group, Inc. and CoStar Realty Information, Inc. (collectively "CoStar"), a copyright owner of numerous photographs of commercial real estate, commenced this copyright infringement action against LoopNet, Inc., an Internet service provider, for direct infringement under §§ 501 and 106 of the Copyright Act because CoStar's copyrighted photographs were posted by LoopNet's subscribers o... More...    $0 (06-21-2004 - MD)

Legg Mason has expressed its "shock" at the extent of the damages awarded to Lowry's by the jur... More...    $19700000 (10-06-2003 - MD)

In this appeal, we address whether an Illinois organization subjected itself to personal jurisdiction in Maryland by operating an Internet website that allegedly infringed the trademark rights of a Maryland insurance company. Carefirst of Maryland ("Carefirst") accuses Chicago-based Carefirst Pregnancy Centers, Inc. ("CPC") of selecting the name CAREFIRST, despite having notice both of Car... More...    $0 (07-02-2003 - MD)

On a motion for summary judgment filed in this copyright infringement action, the district court held that the defendants' copying of a copyrighted manuscript for introduction into evidence in a state-court child-custody proceeding constituted a "fair use" of the manuscript under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 107, when the substance of the manuscript was relevant to the issues in the child-c... More...    $0 (01-24-2003 - MD)

The question presented in this appeal is whether a Georgia-based Internet Service Provider subjected itself to personal jurisdiction in Maryland by enabling a website owner to publish photographs on the Internet, in violation of a Maryland corporation's copyrights. Adapt- ing the traditional due process principles used to determine a State's authority to exercise personal jurisdiction over ou... More...    $0 (06-17-2002 - MD)

Morningside Development, LLC; Morningside Holdings of Satyr Hill, LLC; and G. Neville Turner (collectively, the "Defendants") appeal a judgment of more than $736,000 entered against them, jointly and severally, following an October 2000 bench trial in the District of Maryland. The Defendants assert multiple contentions of error; however, only their challenge to joint and several liability has ... More...    $736037 (06-04-2002 - MD)

This civil action was brought under the Federal Copyright Act of 1976. Plaintiff ALS Scan, Inc. engaged in the business of creating and marketing adult photographs for the Internet. Plaintiff alleged that defendants infringed plaintiff's copyrighted phtographic images on the Internet and by offering them for sale in Maryland via the Internet through memberships to defendants' website. Plaintiff... More...    $0 (05-18-2001 - MD)

Copyright Infringement - Plaintiff sued movie technical consultant alleging copyright infringement. Plaintiff designed patterns for 15 blocks on a quilt to be used in a movie. Another quilt was also needed for the movie and one of the blocks from the original quilt designed by Plaintiff was used on the second quilt. ... More...    $14053 (03-07-2000 - MD)

Copyright infringement claim by security guard who claimed that defendant copied three logo designs of his creation for its team logo.... More...    $0 (11-03-1998 - MD)