|
|
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AMY GONZALEZUNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID MATUSIEWICZ
918-960-5038 |
|
David Matusiewicz1 and Christine Belford were married from 2001 to 2006, during which time they had three children, L.M.1, L.M.2, and K.M.1 (the children). The couple and their children also lived with Belfords one child from a previous marriage, K.M.2.2 After their divorce, Belford and David engaged in a bitter custody dispute, during which David accused Belford of being an unfit mother and ... More... $0 (09-09-2018 - DE) |
|
United States of America v. David Matusiewicz and Thomas Matusiewicz and Lenore Matusiewicz and Amy Gonzalez | |
Three Members of Matusiewicz Family Receive Life Sentences |
|
Glanden v. Quirk | |
Husband and Wife were married for twenty-two years. They separated in |
|
Mary L. Rinnier v.Gracelawn Memorial Park Inc., et al | |
These are the facts as I find them after trial. The petitioner, Mary L. Rinnier |
|
Hartley v. Consolidated Glass Holdings, Inc | |
To understand the arguments that have been raised in this case, it is easier |
|
Garnet O'Marrow and Clarence Gardner v. Dean P. Roles, Jr., d/b/a D&M Training | |
To understand the arguments that have been raised in this case, it is easier |
|
United States of America v. David Matusiewicz, Lenore Matusiewicz and Amy Gonzalez | |
WILMINGTON, DE A federal jury has convicted David T. Matusiewicz, his mother, Lenore Matusiewicz, and his sister, Amy Gonzalez, of interstate stalking and cyberstalking, in violation of federal law. The jury also found all three defendants criminally responsible for the death of Christine Belford, who was murdered in the lobby of the New Castle County Courthouse by co-conspirator Thomas Matusi... More... $0 (07-10-2015 - DE) |
|
G. David Jang, M.D. v. Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | |
This appeal concerns a multimillion-dollar contract dispute over the distribution of profits from medical patents. In particular, it involves U.S. Patent No. 5,922,021 (âthe â021 patentâ), awarded to appellant G. David Jang for coronary stent technology. Jang, a doctor and inventor, sued Boston Scientific Corporation (âBSCâ), the company to which Jang assigned his coronary stent patents,... More... $0 (09-13-2013 - DE) |
|
Kenneth W. Morrissey v. Lorraine B. Morrisey | |
A father filed a motion to modify a child custody and visitation agreement in |
|
Henry Greg Hughes v. Sandra K. Peterson | |
The respondent-appellant, Henry Greg Hughes (âMr. Hughesâ), filed an appeal from the Family Courtâs final judgment regarding attorneyâs fees; its June 15, 2011 order dividing the marital property; and its May 12, 2010 order granting the motion of the petitioner-appellee, Sandra K. Peterson (âMs. Petersonâ), to rescind the partiesâ separation agreement.2 We find no merit to any of the... More... $0 (03-13-2012 - DE) |
|
Danielle M. Stewart v. Thomas D. Stewart | |
The respondent-appellant, Danielle M. Stewart (the âWifeâ), appeals from a Family Court final judgment in favor of the petitioner-appellee, Thomas D. Stewart (the âHusbandâ), arising from the Husbandâs Petition to Modify Alimony and the Wifeâs Motion for Specific Performance and Rule to Show Cause. In this appeal, the Wife contends that the Family Court erred when it reformed the parti... More... $0 (03-15-2012 - DE) |
|
Billie Lynn Thompson v. John R. Lynch | |
In this appeal we consider whether the Court of Chancery lacked subject matter jurisdiction to partition a parcel of land, and whether its decision was based on an adequate factual record. After the partition process had concluded, and appellants learned that they would not receive the divided parcel they wanted, they claimed that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to partition the land because i... More... $0 (02-25-2010 - DE) |
|
Loretta W. Harrington v. Billy B. Allaband | |
This 8th day of January 2008, upon consideration of the parties' briefs on appeal, it appears to the Court that: (1) The appellant, Loretta Harrington (Wife),1 filed this appeal from the Family Court's denial of her motion to open a default judgment against her. The default judgment was granted because Wife failed to appear at the hearing she requested the Family Court to hold to re... More... $0 (01-08-2008 - DE) |
|
Robert A. Thurman, Sr. v. Anna D. Thurman | |
Petitioner-appellant, Robert A. Thurman, Sr. ("Husband"),1 and respondent-appellee, Anna D. Thurman ("Wife"), were divorced on August 15, 2002. A pretrial conference regarding ancillary matters was held on July 31, 2003, for which Husband failed to appear. On August 6, 2003, the Family Court issued its final order with respect to property division, alimony, court costs and counsel fees.2 ... More... $0 (03-12-2004 - DE) |
|
Mir Mousavi v. shahla Vakili | |
This 19th day of December 2003, upon consideration of the parties' briefs, it appears to this Court that: 1. Appellant Mir Mousavi and Appellee Shahla Vakili married on August 12, 1974. They separated in June 1996 and the Family Court entered a final decree of divorce on May 24, 2000. Both parties are physicians and have accumulated a multi-million dollar estate during their marriage. Befo... More... $0 (12-22-2003 - DE) |
|
Laurie G. Wolinski v. Michael L. Wolinski | |
This is an appeal from a decision and order of the Family Court of Delaware concerning a property division following the divorce of Laurie and Michael Wolinski. Following a hearing on January 29, 2002, the trial judge issued a Decision and Order on March 25, 2002. On June 28, 2002, the trial judge issued a Letter Decision and Order granting in part and denying in part Wife's Motion for Reargu... More... $1 (04-14-2003 - DE) |