Delaware Divorce Law
 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AMY GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID MATUSIEWICZ


Sooner Cannabis Consultants
Click Here For Expert Help
918-960-5038

David Matusiewicz1 and Christine Belford were married from 2001 to 2006, during which time they had three children, L.M.1, L.M.2, and K.M.1 (the “children”). The couple and their children also lived with Belford’s one child from a previous marriage, K.M.2.2 After their divorce, Belford and David engaged in a bitter custody dispute, during which David accused Belford of being an unfit mother and ... More...    $0 (09-09-2018 - DE)

United States of America v. David Matusiewicz and Thomas Matusiewicz and Lenore Matusiewicz and Amy Gonzalez

Three Members of Matusiewicz Family Receive Life Sentences

WILMINGTON, Del. – David C. Weiss, Acting United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, Kevin L. Perkins, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Baltimore Division, and Nathaniel McQueen, Jr., Colonel, Delaware State Police, announced today that United States District Court Judge Gerald A. McHugh sentence... More...
   $0 (02-18-2016 - DE)

Glanden v. Quirk

Husband and Wife were married for twenty-two years. They separated in
September 2012, and their divorce became final in 2013. The couple had over $6
million in assets, including a $1.5 million house, investment accounts, retirement
accounts, and other property. Husband worked as an associate and then as a partner in a major law firm,
earning a substantial income. In May 2... More...
   $0 (12-07-2015 - DE)

Mary L. Rinnier v.Gracelawn Memorial Park Inc., et al

These are the facts as I find them after trial. The petitioner, Mary L. Rinnier
(―Ms. Rinnier‖), is the mother of Laura Bowdoin (―Mrs. Bowdoin‖). Mrs.
Bowdoin, who was married to the respondent, George Bowdoin (―Mr. Bowdoin‖),
died in Pasco County, Florida on June 19, 2008. Mr. and Mrs. Bowdoin had one
daughter, B., who was twelve at the t... More...
   $0 (11-24-2015 - DE)

Hartley v. Consolidated Glass Holdings, Inc

To understand the arguments that have been raised in this case, it is easier
first to describe what HFA is not, rather than what it is. HFA is not a recorded
subdivision in Sussex County. There is no plot plan, recorded or otherwise,
showing the numbered lots within HFA. Instead, HFA consists of several parcels
of land along a private road near Bridgeville.1 These parcels w... More...
   $0 (10-04-2015 - DE)

Garnet O'Marrow and Clarence Gardner v. Dean P. Roles, Jr., d/b/a D&M Training

To understand the arguments that have been raised in this case, it is easier
first to describe what HFA is not, rather than what it is. HFA is not a recorded
subdivision in Sussex County. There is no plot plan, recorded or otherwise,
showing the numbered lots within HFA. Instead, HFA consists of several parcels
of land along a private road near Bridgeville.1 These parcels w... More...
   $0 (10-04-2015 - DE)

United States of America v. David Matusiewicz, Lenore Matusiewicz and Amy Gonzalez

WILMINGTON, DE – A federal jury has convicted David T. Matusiewicz, his mother, Lenore Matusiewicz, and his sister, Amy Gonzalez, of interstate stalking and cyberstalking, in violation of federal law. The jury also found all three defendants criminally responsible for the death of Christine Belford, who was murdered in the lobby of the New Castle County Courthouse by co-conspirator Thomas Matusi... More...    $0 (07-10-2015 - DE)

G. David Jang, M.D. v. Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.

This appeal concerns a multimillion-dollar contract dispute over the distribution of profits from medical patents. In particular, it involves U.S. Patent No. 5,922,021 (“the ‘021 patent”), awarded to appellant G. David Jang for coronary stent technology. Jang, a doctor and inventor, sued Boston Scientific Corporation (“BSC”), the company to which Jang assigned his coronary stent patents,... More...    $0 (09-13-2013 - DE)

Kenneth W. Morrissey v. Lorraine B. Morrisey

A father filed a motion to modify a child custody and visitation agreement in
the Family Court. The trial judge denied the father’s motion, holding that contract
principles govern the agreement and bar the trial court from modifying
unambiguous contract language. On appeal, the father claims that the trial judge
erroneously applied contract principles to a custody and visitation ... More...
   $0 (04-18-2012 - DE)

Henry Greg Hughes v. Sandra K. Peterson

The respondent-appellant, Henry Greg Hughes (“Mr. Hughes”), filed an appeal from the Family Court’s final judgment regarding attorney’s fees; its June 15, 2011 order dividing the marital property; and its May 12, 2010 order granting the motion of the petitioner-appellee, Sandra K. Peterson (“Ms. Peterson”), to rescind the parties’ separation agreement.2 We find no merit to any of the... More...    $0 (03-13-2012 - DE)

Danielle M. Stewart v. Thomas D. Stewart

The respondent-appellant, Danielle M. Stewart (the “Wife”), appeals from a Family Court final judgment in favor of the petitioner-appellee, Thomas D. Stewart (the “Husband”), arising from the Husband’s Petition to Modify Alimony and the Wife’s Motion for Specific Performance and Rule to Show Cause. In this appeal, the Wife contends that the Family Court erred when it reformed the parti... More...    $0 (03-15-2012 - DE)

Billie Lynn Thompson v. John R. Lynch

In this appeal we consider whether the Court of Chancery lacked subject matter jurisdiction to partition a parcel of land, and whether its decision was based on an adequate factual record. After the partition process had concluded, and appellants learned that they would not receive the divided parcel they wanted, they claimed that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to partition the land because i... More...    $0 (02-25-2010 - DE)

Loretta W. Harrington v. Billy B. Allaband

This 8th day of January 2008, upon consideration of the parties' briefs on appeal, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, Loretta Harrington (Wife),1 filed this appeal from the Family Court's denial of her motion to open a default judgment against her. The default judgment was granted because Wife failed to appear at the hearing she requested the Family Court to hold to re... More...    $0 (01-08-2008 - DE)

Robert A. Thurman, Sr. v. Anna D. Thurman

Petitioner-appellant, Robert A. Thurman, Sr. ("Husband"),1 and respondent-appellee, Anna D. Thurman ("Wife"), were divorced on August 15, 2002. A pretrial conference regarding ancillary matters was held on July 31, 2003, for which Husband failed to appear. On August 6, 2003, the Family Court issued its final order with respect to property division, alimony, court costs and counsel fees.2

... More...    $0 (03-12-2004 - DE)

Mir Mousavi v. shahla Vakili

This 19th day of December 2003, upon consideration of the parties' briefs, it appears to this Court that:

1. Appellant Mir Mousavi and Appellee Shahla Vakili married on August 12, 1974. They separated in June 1996 and the Family Court entered a final decree of divorce on May 24, 2000. Both parties are physicians and have accumulated a multi-million dollar estate during their marriage. Befo... More...    $0 (12-22-2003 - DE)

Laurie G. Wolinski v. Michael L. Wolinski

This is an appeal from a decision and order of the Family Court of Delaware concerning a property division following the divorce of Laurie and Michael Wolinski. Following a hearing on January 29, 2002, the trial judge issued a Decision and Order on March 25, 2002. On June 28, 2002, the trial judge issued a Letter Decision and Order granting in part and denying in part Wife's Motion for Reargu... More...    $1 (04-14-2003 - DE)

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher
array(8) { [0]=> string(1) "8" ["id"]=> string(1) "8" [1]=> string(2) "DE" ["state1"]=> string(2) "DE" [2]=> string(8) "Delaware" ["state2"]=> string(8) "Delaware" [3]=> string(0) "" ["state3"]=> string(0) "" }