Delaware Copyright infringement Law

Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc.

<h2> Wilmington, Delaware patent lawyers represented the Plaintiff which sought damages for infringement. </h2> Acceleration Bay, LLC sued Amazon Web Services, Inc. on a patent infringement theory claiming that Amazon's CloudFront content-delivery system and Virtual Private Cloud virtual network infringe two patents owned by Acceleration Bay LLC. Amazon argued that its techno... More...

$0 (10-01-2024 - DE)

B.E. Technology, LLC v. Twitter, Inc. and Google, LLC

Wilmington, Delaware patent infringement lawyer represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendants claiming that they were violating "United States Patent Nos, 8,549,410 ("the '410 patentâ€), 8,549,411 ("the '411 patentâ€), and 8,769,440 ("the '440 patentâ€) (collectively "the Asserted Patentsâ€). D.1.1. All of the /Asserted Patents expired in 2018. D.I. 67 at 2. The PT AB i... More...

$0 (05-16-2023 - DE)

James R. Adams v. Governor of Delaware

<center> <img width="300" src="https://www.usmarshals.gov/district/de/locations/delaware.jpg"> </center> James R. Adams is a resident and member of the State Bar of Delaware. For some time, he has expressed a desire to be considered for a judicial position in that state. Following the announcement of several judicial vacancies, Adams considered applying but ultimately chose not to... More...

$0 (04-10-2019 - DE)

James R. Adams v. Governor of Delaware

<center> <img width="300" src="http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/BLD2.jpg"> </center> James R. Adams is a resident and member of the State Bar of Delaware. For some time, he has expressed a desire to be considered for a judicial position in that state. Following the announcement of several judicial vacancies, Adams considered applying but ultimately chose not to beca... More...

$0 (02-06-2019 - DE)

International Business Machines Corporation v. Groupon, Inc.

Wilmington, DE - Jury Awards IBM $82.5 Million in Damages Against Groupon International Business Machines Corporation sued Groupon, Inc. on patent infringement theories relating to: U.S. Patent No. 5796967, titled Method for Presenting Applications in an Interactive Service. Issued in August 1998, it covers a method for presenting interactive applications on a computer n... More...

$85500000 (08-02-2018 - DE)

Gerald A. Lechliter v. Del. Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Control, et al.

The Plaintiff filed his Verified Complaint on October 11, 2012. The Complaint alleged seven counts against the Defendants: Count I alleges that DNREC violated numerous statutes to illegally build the Turbine; Count II alleges that the City violated statutes and zoning ordinances to illegally issue the Building Permit; Counts III and IV allege violations of the Delaware Freedom... More...

$0 (01-01-2016 - DE)

Pipal Tech Ventures Private Limited v. MoEngage, Inc.

Plaintiff Pipal Tech is a closely-held corporation formed in 2011 under the laws of India with its principal place of business in India.4 Pipal Tech is in the business of developing, licensing, and supporting mobile and web-based applications. Non-parties Amit Baid, Raviteja Dodda, and Yashwanth Kumar are the founders of Pipal Tech.6 Dodda and Kumar are also former executives and board The fact... More...

$0 (12-19-2015 - DE)

Revolution Retail Systems, LLC v. Sentinel Technologies, Inc.

In 2011, Vector proposed a term sheet to acquire Tidel and its subsidiary, Revolution. Tidel‟s majority stockholder, however, had high expectations for Revolution‟s business prospects, and Tidel‟s Board rejected Vector‟s offer. Vector later offered to acquire only Tidel, which Tidel accepted. Tidel and Revolution formally were separated into two indep... More...

$0 (11-01-2015 - DE)

Microsoft Corporation v. Patent Revue Partners, et al.

Plaintiff, Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), is a Washington corporation with its principal place of business at One Microsoft Way, Redmond, Washington. Microsoft continuously has owned Series F Preferred Stock in Nominal Defendant Vadem Ltd. since 1999. Nominal Defendant Vadem, Ltd. (“Vadem,” “Vadem BVI,” or the “Company”) is a privately held international... More...

$0 (10-18-2015 - DE)

Eitan Konstantino v. AngioScore, Inc., et al.

Plaintiff Dr. Eitan Konstantino was one of the founders of Angioscore. Konstantino served as an officer of AngioScore from its formation in 2003 until March 31, 2007, and as a director of AngioScore from 2003 until February 5, 2010. AngioScore is a Delaware corporation. It develops, manufactures, and markets the AngioSculpt Scoring Balloon Catheter (“AngioSculpt”) for bo... More...

$0 (10-04-2015 - DE)

CMS Investment Holdings, LLC v. Lawrence E. Castle

The plaintiff in this action invested in a Delaware limited liability company (â€•LLCâ€–) whose business was providing non-legal administrative services to law firms and their mortgage lender clients in connection with mortgage foreclosures. That business was created by the principal defendants: five individuals who practiced law in Colorado and Arkansas. Seeking to monet... More...

$0 (06-23-2015 - DE)

Intellectual Ventures I, LLC, et al. v. Motorola Mobility, LLC

Wilmington, DE - Intellectual Ventures sued Motorola Mobility on a patent infringement theory claiming that Motorola wrongfully infringed a patent on multimedia test messaging held by Intellectual Ventures. Intellectual Ventures is one of the largest intellectual property owners in the world. It holds more than 70,000 patents and applications. Recent court docket entries: <... More...

$1 (03-25-2015 - DE)

United States of America v. Nathan Leroux, Sanadodeh Nesheiwat, David Pokora, and Austin Alcala

WILMINGTON, Del. â€“ Four members of an international computer hacking ring have been charged with breaking into computer networks of prominent technology companies and the U.S. Army and stealing more than $100 million in intellectual property and other proprietary data. Two of the charged members have already pleaded guilty. The alleged cyber theft included software and data related to the... More...

$0 (09-30-2014 - DE)

G. David Jang, M.D. v. Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.

This appeal concerns a multimillion-dollar contract dispute over the distribution of profits from medical patents. In particular, it involves U.S. Patent No. 5,922,021 ("the '021 patentâ€), awarded to appellant G. David Jang for coronary stent technology. Jang, a doctor and inventor, sued Boston Scientific Corporation ("BSCâ€), the company to which Jang assigned his coronary stent patent... More...

$0 (09-13-2013 - DE)

DePuy Synthes Products, LLC v. Globus Medical, Inc.

DePuy Synthes Products, LLC sued Globus Medical, Inc. on a patent infringement theory claiming three products previously sold by Globus Medical did infringe on Synthes' patents. Globus issues the following press release: Globus Medical, Inc. (NYSE: GMED), a leading spinal implant manufacturer, today announced that the jury in a patent infringement case in the U.S. District Court in ... More...

$16000000 (06-17-2013 - DE)

XpertUniverse Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

XpertUniverse Inc. sued Cisco Systems Inc. on a patent infringement theory claiming Cisco's "Expert on Demand" software platform was based on software that it developed. Plaintiff claimed that Defendant violated a non-disclosure agreement it had signed and filed for patents on technology developed by XpertUniverse. Cisco was to distribute software that matched customers with call center experts. ... More...

$70000000 (03-22-2013 - DE)

Sunovion Pharmaceuticals v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Mylan Inc. (MYL) announced Friday that a jury has rendered an unfavorable verdict in a patent infringement lawsuit filed by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., f/k/a Sepracor Inc., against Mylan Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Dey Inc. and Dey Pharma, L.P. in relation to Dey's Abbreviated New Drug Application or ANDA for Levalbuterol Hydrochloride (HCl) Inhalation Solution, 0.31 mg/3 mL, 0.63 mg/3 mL... More...

$18000000 (02-11-2012 - DE)

LG Electronics USA, Inc. et al. v. Whirlpool Corp.

LG Electronics USA, Inc. et al. sued Whirlpool Corp. on a patent infringement theory claiming that Whirlpool's patents relating to ice makers were invalid. Whirlpool claimed that LG's icemarker units in its side-by-side refrigerators violated its patents. Whirlpool sought damages and injunctive relief.... More...

$1780000 (03-12-2010 - DE)

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Acceleron, L.L.C.

Hewlett-Packard Company ("HPâ€) sued Acceleron LLC ("Acceleronâ€), the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,948,021 ("'021 patentâ€), in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the '021 patent. The district court granted Acceleron's motion to dismiss for lack of declaratory judgment jurisdiction. For the... More...

$0 (12-04-2009 - DE)

ZF Meritor, L.L.C., et al. v. Eaton Corporation

ArvinMeritor Inc. sued Eaton Corp. on an antitrust violation theory claiming that Defendant engaged in anticompetitive conduct in the sale and marketing of heavy-duty truck transmissions. Plaintiff claimed that Eaton's anticompetitive behavior forced it out of the Nafta line-haul transmission business and led to the demise of its venture with ZF Industries. n 2005, Eaton won a ruling fro... More...

$1 (10-09-2009 - DE)

Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc.

In this patent infringement action, Nutrinova, Inc.; Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties and Food Ingredients GmbH; and Lonza, Ltd. (collectively "Lonzaâ€) appeal from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware that Lonza infringed certain specified claims of Martek's U.S. Patent Nos. 5,340,594 ("the '594 patentâ€) and 6,410,281 ("the '281 patentâ€... More...

$0 (09-03-2009 - DE)

Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.

Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson, Inc. (collectively "Cordisâ€) appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware denying a motion for a new trial and judgment as a matter of law ("JMOLâ€) following a jury verdict of infringement of claim 8 of U.S. Patent 6,120,536 ("the '536 patentâ€). See Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corp... More...

$0 (01-19-2009 - DE)

Finjan Software, Inc. v. Secure Computing Corporation, CyberGuard and Webwasher

IT security firm Finjan sued Secure Computing, CyberGuard and Webwasher on a willful patent infringement theory claiming that defendants wrongful used technology patented by Finjan.... More...

$1 (03-19-2008 - DE)

Cordis Corporation v. Medtronic Ave, Inc.

- These consolidated appeals arise from two related cases in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. In both cases, Cordis Corp. alleged that the defendants had infringed its patents covering vascular stents that are used to treat coronary artery disease. After separate trials, Cordis obtained jury verdicts of infringement against defendant Medtronic AVE, Inc., ("AVE") i... More...

$0 (01-10-2008 - DE)

Callaway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Company

Callaway Golf Co. sued Acushnet Company on a patent infringement theory claiming that defendant infringed three patents concerning Titleist Pro V1 golf balls. Defendant denied wrongdoing.... More...

$1 (12-15-2007 - DE)

TruePosition, Inc. v. Andrew Corporation

Liberty Media Holding Corp.'s TruePosition Inc. sued Andrew Corp. on a patent infringement theory claiming that defendant wrongfully used its patented technology for identifying the location of cell phones. Andrew Corporation denied wrongdoing. ... More...

$45300000 (09-18-2007 - DE)

Inline Connection Corp. v. Earthlink, Inc.

Inline Connection Corp. sued Earthlink on a patent infringement theory claiming that Defendant used a series of patents relating to the installation of high-speed asymmetric digial subscriber line (ADSL) computer connections held by it. Inline claimed that industry-standard use of ADSL self-installed units is a violation of its patents. Inline sought $28 million in damages. Earthlink de... More...

$0 (02-21-2007 - DE)

Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.

Power Integrations (OTC: POWI), the leader in high-voltage analog integrated circuits for power conversion, today announced that it has won a verdict in its patent-infringement lawsuit against Fairchild Semiconductor. A jury found that Fairchild has willfully infringed all four Power Integrations patents asserted in the case, and has awarded Power Integrations damages of approximately $34 milli... More...

$34000000 (10-11-2006 - DE)

Cryovac Inc. v. Pechiney Plastic Inc.

Cryovac Inc. sued Pechiney Plastic Inc. for patent infringement relating to a patent on puncture-resistant bags used to store fresh-cut meat. Pechiney Plastic Packaging claimed that Cryovac's patent was not valid.... More...

$2500000 (06-23-2006 - DE)

IMX, Inc. v. E-Loan, Inc., et al.

IMX, Inc. sued Lending Treet, LLC on a patent infringement theory for infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,995,947 relating to technology that provides an Internet-accessible, interactive, real-time network for borrowers and lenders to use to exchange information that lenders need to loan money to borrowers. IMX, Inc., based in Houston, Texas, is a leading provider of software solutions for th... More...

$5794400 (01-24-2006 - DE)

PHT Corporation v. eTrials Worldwide

PHT Corporation sued eTrials Worldwide for patent infringement of PHT's patent for of electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) solutions software. PHT Corporation, the market-leading provider of electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) solutions used in over 165 trials worldwide, today announced that it has reached an agreement with etrials Worldwide, Inc to settle the intellectual property... More...

$1 (08-24-2005 - DE)

Cordis Corporation v. Boston Scientific, et al.

Cordis Corporation, a <a href="http://www.jnj.com/" target="_new">Johnson & Johnson</a> company, today (June 21, 2005) announed that a U.S. District Court jury in Wilmington, Delaware, found that Boston Scientific's Taxus drug-eluting stent and its Liberte and Express bare metal stents infringe Cordis Corporation's pioneering Palmaz patent for bloon expandable stents, and that the bare metal Li... More...

$1 (06-22-2005 - DE)

Cordis Corporation v. Medtronic Vascular

Johnson & Johnson Inc. and Cordis Corp. sued Medtronic Inc. for patient infringement relating to the Medtronic Microstent II, GFX and GFX II coronary stents, which it no longer sells. Stents are tiny wire metal mesh devices used to prop open arteries. Cordis took the position that the patents also apply to some current Medtronic stents, including its Driver stent.... More...

$271000000 (03-14-2005 - DE)

Syngenta Crop. v. Monsanto Company, et al.

Monsanto Company (NYSE: MON) announced today that a jury has found in favor of Monsanto Company and co-defendant DowAgroSciences in a patent infringement case brought by Syngenta Seeds, Inc. "The jury's finding in this case is further confirmation of the fact that Monsanto's scientists were the first to invent this important technology," said Robert T. Fraley, Ph.D., executive vice presi... More...

$0 (12-16-2004 - DE)

Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Proxim, Inc.

Patent infringement claim by Symbol Technologies, Inc. on two patents for power-saving technologies for laptop computers and cell phones against Proxim, Inc. Proxim admitted that it installed similar features but denied that the technology used by it infringed on Symbol's patents.... More...

$22600000 (11-22-2003 - DE)

Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Proxim, Inc.

Patent infringement claim by Symbol Technologies' which claimed patent infringement by of Proxim two Symbol Technologies patents. and assessed a 6% royalty on Proxim's sales of these products from 1995. ... More...

$22000000 (09-15-2003 - DE)

<a href="http://www.ciena.com/" target="_new">Ciena Corporation</a>, et al v. <a href="http://www.corvis.com/" target="_new">Corvis Corporation</a>

CIENA's suit alleged Corvis' infringement of four CIENA patents for optical transport technology. In a February 2003 trial, a jury found that one of these patents was infringed and that two were not infringed, but the jury was deadlocked on the fourth patent. Today's verdict in favor of CIENA was the result of a retrial specifically for the fourth patent. CIENA plans to move for an injunction p... More...

$0 (04-28-2003 - DE)

MKS Instruments, Inc. v. Advanced Energy

Patent infringement claim relating to semiconductor manufacturing equipment. The device in question dissociates gases for use in semiconductor processing applications. Advanced Energy claimed that it did not infringe MKS' patent and that the patent was obvious.... More...

$4200000 (05-17-2002 - DE)

MLMC Ltd. v. Verizon Wireless, Inc.

Patent infringement claim relating to cell phone technology.... More...

$0 (12-04-2001 - DE)

Intel Corporation v. Broadcom

Patent Infringement Claim - Intel Corporation claimed that Broadcom Corportion infringed two of Intel's patents, one for expanding a compressed video signal and another for computer networking. MPEG is a video compression standard and Ethernet is a standard for networking computers together. Intel sought $82 million in damages.... More...

$0 (12-14-2001 - DE)