The defendant, Donald Raynor, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly denied the defendant’s motion in limine to exclude or limit the scope of the testimony of the state’s expert witness on firearm and toolmark identification, and (2) abuse... More...    $0 (05-05-2018 - CT)

The defendant, George Michael Leniart, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a),1 and three counts of capital felony in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 53a54b (5), (7) and (9), as amended by Public Acts 1995, No. 95-16, § 4.2 The defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a... More...    $0 (06-07-2016 - CT)

Upon a grant of certification to appeal, the petitioner, Johnnie Arthur, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court’s decision should be reversed because that court erred by not concluding that the petitioner’s trial counsel, Attorney Lawrence Hopkins, rendered ineffective assistanc... More...    $0 (01-19-2016 - CT)

The charges in this case arise from Litvak’s conduct as a 4  
securities broker and trader at Jefferies & Company (“Jefferies”), a 5  
global securities broker‐dealer and investment banking firm.1   6  
In January 2013, the government filed an indictment charging 7  
Litvak with eleven counts of securities fraud, see 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 8  
78ff (Counts 1–11), one c... More...    $0 (01-03-2016 - CT)

The charges in this case arise from Litvak’s conduct as a securities broker and trader at Jefferies & Company (“Jefferies”), a 
global securities broker‐dealer and investment banking firm. In January 2013, the government filed an indictment charging 7  
Litvak with eleven counts of securities fraud, see 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78ff (Counts 1-11), one count of fraud against the United St... More...    $0 (12-25-2015 - CT)

The defendant, Chung Family Realty Partnership, LLC, appeals from the trial court’s order granting the application for a prejudgment remedy filed by the plaintiff, Landmark Investment Group, LLC. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the doctrine of res judicata prevents the plaintiff from relitigating issues that have been or could have been litigated in the first litigation; and (2) the cou... More...    $0 (08-28-2012 - CT)

The plaintiffs, Diana Michele Milton and her husband, Clive Milton,1 appeal from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Biogen Idec, Inc. (Biogen), Yale University School of Medicine (university) and Yale-New Haven Hospital (hospital).2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court (1) erroneously ordered a Porter3 hearing regarding one of her expert witnesse... More...    $0 (09-27-2011 - CT)

The plaintiff, Ramiro Rodriguez, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) to dismiss his claim for benefits for injuries he suffered in an accident while installing a roof for the defendant E.D. Construction, Inc.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the board improperly affirmed... More...    $0 (02-18-2011 - CT)

The named plaintiff, Eric Klein,1 appeals, following our grant of his petition for certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgment, rendered after a jury verdict in a medical malpractice action, in favor of the defendant, Norwalk Hospital. The plaintiff claims that the Appellate Court, without reaching the merits of his individual claims, improperly c... More...    $0 (12-21-2010 - CT)

In this workers’ compensation appeal, we are presented with the question, which was raised but not decided in Lafayette v. General Dynamics Corp., 255 Conn. 762, 781, 770 A.2d 1 (2001), of whether the causation standard applied by a United States Department of Labor administrative law judge (administrative law judge) in a prior proceeding brought under the federal Longshore and Harbor Workers’... More...    $0 (08-19-2008 - CT)

The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether there was a reasonable basis in the facts found for the workers' compensation commissioner to have determined that the plaintiff had not met his burden of proving that he was injured during the course of his employment. The defendants, the borough of Naugatuck and its insurer, the Hartford Insurance Group, appeal, following our grant of ... More...    $0 (02-16-2004 - CT)

MCLACHLAN, J. The plaintiff, Heyward Sellers, appeals from the decision of the workers' compensation review board (board) affirming the May 9, 2001 findings and award of the workers' compensation commissioner (commissioner) for the fifth district. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the commissioner improperly (1) denied the plaintiff total incapacity benefits, pursuant to General Statu... More...    $0 (10-20-2003 - CT)

The defendant, Mark J. Decker, a physician, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the trial court's judgment in his favor and granting the plaintiff, Gilbert Hayes, a new trial. The sole question in this certified appeal is ‘‘[d]id the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff's expert's proffered testimony regarding the effect of discontinuation of blood ... More...    $0 (05-30-2003 - CT)