Water Pik, Inc. v. Med-Systems, Inc. |
The parties to this trademark dispute make consumer products for rinsing sinus cavities. Med-Systems, Inc., the earlier entrant in this market, sells its products under the federally registered trademark SinuCleanse and two similar marks. Water Pik, Inc., which traditionally sold oral irrigators and showerheads, registered the trademark SINUSENSE with the intention of selling sinus-irrigation devi $0 (08-12-2013 - OK) |
Simon Solotko, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. LegalZoom.com, Inc. |
Simon Solotko brings this interlocutory appeal challenging the trial court’s order denying Solotko’s motion to certify a nationwide class. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014(a)(3). Because we conclude that the trial court acted within its discretion, we affirm the trial court’s order denying class certification. |
Evergreen Partnering Group, Inc. v. Pactiv Corporation |
Plaintiff Evergreen Partnering Group, Inc. ("Evergreen") appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissing its Second Amended Complaint ("complaint"). The complaint alleges that defendants-appellees, polystyrene food service packaging manufacturers and two trade associations, refused in concert to deal with Evergreen in a recycling business m $0 (06-19-2013 - MA) |
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. |
Respondent Myriad Genetics, Inc. (Myriad), discovered the precise location and sequence of two human genes, mutations of which can substantially increase the risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Myriad obtained a number of patents based upon its discovery. This case involves claims from three of them and requires us to resolve whether a naturally occurring segment of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is $0 (06-13-2013 - ) |
United States of America v. Shengyang Zhou a/k/a Tom |
Mr. Shengyang Zhou pled guilty to trafficking and attempted trafficking of counterfeit goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320 and § 2. He was sentenced to eighty-seven months’ imprisonment and three years’ supervised release, and he was ordered to pay restitution of $507,567. Mr. Zhou contends the district court made a number of errors in sentencing him. We disagree and affirm. |
Ryan Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc. |
In 2009, Appellant Ryan Hart (“Appellant” or “Hart”)1 brought suit against Appellee Electronic Arts, Inc. (“Appellee” or “EA”) for allegedly violating his right of publicity as recognized under New Jersey law. Specifically, Appellant‟s claims stemmed from Appellee‟s alleged use of his likeness and biographical information in its NCAA Football series of videogames. The District $0 (05-21-2013 - nj) |
Pollution Control Corporation v. Renegade Oilfield Products LLC |
Pollution Control Corporation sued Renegade Oilfield Products LLC on a patent infringement theory. |
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. Jorge Perez |
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company appeals a county court order entering summary judgment in favor of Dr. Jeffrey Tedder, as assignee of Jorge |
United States of America v. Steven Warshak |
Berkeley Premium Nutraceuticals, Inc., was an incredibly profitable company that served as the distributor of Enzyte, an herbal supplement purported to enhance male sexual performance. In this appeal, defendants Steven Warshak (“Warshak”), Harriet Warshak (“Harriet”), and TCI Media, Inc. (“TCI”), challenge their convictions stemming from a massive scheme to defraud Berkeley’s custome $0 (06-12-2010 - OH) |
The People v. Jack Kenneth Davis |
Defendant Jack Kenneth Davis appeals a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a deadly weapon, specifically a billy (Pen. Code, former § 12020, subd. (a)1), and displaying false evidence of registration (Veh. Code, § 4462.5). The jury acquitted him of the charge of carrying a dirk or dagger. (§ 12020, subd. (a).) The trial court suspended imposition of sentence $0 (03-28-2013 - CA) |
Klein-Becker USA, LLC v. Patrick Englert d/b/a Mr. Finest Supplements |
Klein-Becker USA and Klein-Becker IP Holdings (collectively “Klein-Becker”) |
Della Yeager v. Michael Morris, Jr. |
¶1 Della Yeager and her minor daughter, Veronica Riphenburg, were injured when their vehicle was involved in a collision with a pickup truck driven by Michael Morris, Jr. (Morris, Jr.), a Glacier County resident. The pickup truck was owned by Michael Morris, Sr. (Morris, Sr.), a Teton County resident. The collision occurred in Teton County but Yeager’s vehicle was then propelled across the coun $0 (02-27-2013 - MT) |
Matthew Hale v. United States of America |
Chief Judge. Matthew Hale was the Matthew Hale was the head of a group now known as the Creativity Movement. |
Yellowbook, Inc. v. Steven M. Brandeberry |
This case involves a trademark dispute over the right |
Christopher J. Magleby dba Select Builders v. Kevin Garn |
This appeal relates to attorney fees incurred in litigation arising from a construction contract for a custom cabin in Island Park, Idaho. There are two issues in this case: first, whether the district court erred in holding that the Maglebys were entitled to recover only $2,500 from defaulting parties by operation of I.R.C.P. 54(e)(4); and second, whether the district court erred in its decision $0 (02-26-2013 - ID) |
Jimico Enterprises v. Lehigh Gas Corporation |
Defendant Lehigh Gas Corporation (“Lehigh”) appeals from a summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Glenn T. Suddaby, Judge) awarding damages to plaintiffs, Jimico Enterprises, Inc. (“Jimico”) and Brownson Enterprises, Inc. (“Brownson,” jointly “plaintiffs”), under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (“PMPA” or “Act”), 15 $0 (02-20-2013 - Ny) |
Jerry W. Gunn v. Vernon F. Minton |
Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases“arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents.” 28 U. S. C. §1338(a). The question presented is whether a state law claim alleging legal malpractice in the handling of a patent case must be brought in federal court. |
Gail Bierman v. Scott Weier |
This defamation case concerns Mind, Body and Soul, a book written by Scott Weier. In the author’s words, the book is “based on my life.” It discusses Scott’s personal transformation, largely through his relationship with God, following his divorce “on bad terms” from his first wife. Scott’s ex-wife and her father concluded the book falsely accused them of lying, abuse, and suffering $0 (01-18-2013 - IA) |
John Riedlinger v. Steam Brothers, Inc. d/b/a Steam Brothers Carpet Cleaning |
[¶1] Steam Brothers, Inc., doing business as Steam Brothers Carpet Cleaning, appealed from a summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action by John Riedlinger, Dale Stroh, Kevin Vetter, Leo Horner, and Duane Leier, five individuals with separate license agreements creating business relationships with Steam Brothers (collectively referred to as "licensees"), in which the district court decided $0 (01-28-2013 - ND) |
Sharon Bell v. Igal J. Feibush |
Penal Code section 496, subdivision (a) (section 496(a)) makes receiving or buying property “that has been obtained in any manner constituting theft” a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment. Section 496, subdivision (c) (section 496(c)) provides that any person “who has been injured by a violation of [section 496(a)] . . . may bring an action for three times the amount of actual damage $0 (01-20-2013 - CA) |
Evans Group, Inc. v. Robert Foti |
¶ 1. BURGESS, J. Appellant Foti Fuels, Inc. (Foti), a fuel distributor, appeals from the Washington Civil Division’s judgment in favor of Evans Group, Inc. (Evans), also a fuel distributor. Evans cancelled its agreement to sell fuel to Foti for resale and delivery to a retail gasoline station, and sued for payment of an outstanding balance of $68,864. Foti claims the unilateral t $0 (09-14-2012 - VT) |
Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. Building #19, Inc. |
Defendant-appellant Building #19, Inc. appeals from the entry of a preliminary injunction restricting its use of the word "Swarovski" in newspaper advertising to a certain font size. The case is ongoing in the district court, with requests for permanent injunctive relief pending. The dispute began when Building #19 obtained a number of Swarovski crystal figurines that it hoped to resell, and in o $0 (01-10-2013 - RI) |
John E. Gibson v. Texas Department of Insurance - Division of Workers' Compensation |
In February 2011 the Texas Department of Insurance issued a cease and desist letter to Appellant John Gibson, arguing that his use of the words “Texas” and “Workers’ Comp” in the domain name of his website violated § 419.002 of the Texas Labor Code. Gibson filed a complaint in the Northern District of Texas, alleging that the statute was unconstitutional under the First, Fifth, and Four $0 (11-01-2012 - TX) |
Winchest Mystery House, LLC v. Global Asylum, Inc. |
After defendant Global Asylum, Inc. released its film “Haunting of Winchester House,” plaintiff Winchester Mystery House, LLC filed an action alleging unauthorized use of its trademarks (15 U.S.C. § 1114), unfair competition (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)), and interference with contract and economic advantage. Defendant brought a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. On appeal, $0 (10-24-2012 - CA) |
Nicole Pulcher v. Japanese Food Express, dba Oklahoma JFE |
Nicole Pulcher sued Japanese Food Express, dba Oklahoma JFE; Japanese Express, Inc., JFE, Inc., JFE Partnership K461, JFE Partnership and Park Brothers, Inc. on breach of contract , fraud, and fraud in the inducement theories seeking rescission and damages. |
Next Page |