United States of America v. Robert Berg Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Berg Sportswear |
Bangor, ME - Maine Corporation Fined $10,000 for Counterfeit Goods Trafficking |
American Freedom Defense v. King County |
Defendant King Countys public transit agency, Metro, |
Benihana of Tokyo Inc v. Benihana Inc |
We only need summarize the facts of this case. Rocky Aoki founded appellant |
DUTY FREE AMERICAS, INC. vs. THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES, INC. |
The essential facts contained in DFAs complaint and its attached exhibits |
AKEBIA THERAPEUTICS, INC. v. FIBROGEN, INC. |
Respondent FibroGen, Inc., appeals the district courts order granting an ex parte application, filed by Petitioner Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782, for discovery in aid of foreign proceedings. The district court held, among other things, that Akebia was an interested person within the meaning of § 1782 and that the Japanese and European Patent Offices are tribunals to $0 (07-19-2015 - ) |
CFE Racing Products, Inc. v. BMF Wheels, Inc. |
Plaintiff CFE Racing Products, Inc. (Plaintiff) appeals from the |
Ross W. Greene v. The Center for Collaborative Problem Solving, Inc. |
Dr. Ross W. Greene ("Greene") |
Arborjet, Inc. v. Rainbow Treecare Scientific Advancements, Inc. |
This appeal challenges a |
Paul B. Tartell, M.C. v. South Florida Sinus and Allergy Center, Inc. and Lee M. Mandel, M.D. |
This appeal requires us to decide whether the district court clearly erred when it found that a physicianâs name had acquired âsecondary meaning,â Tana v. Dantannaâs, 611 F.3d 767, 774 (11th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). Dr. Paul B. Tartell and Dr. Lee M. Mandel jointly practiced medicine in South Florida until 2011. After they split their practices, Dr. Mandel registered $0 (06-25-2015 - FL) |
Chris E. Carhart v. Carhart-Halaska International, LLC |
Karl Marx famously remarked that |
John Dewey Holt v. Kamagon Fitness, Karen L. Reed, Mark Reed and Hedstrom PLastics, Inc. |
Tulsa, OK - John Dewey Holt sued Kamagon Fitness, Karen L. Reed, Mark Reed and Hedstrom PLastics, Inc. on fraud, breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, libel and tortious interference with contract theories claiming: |
United States of America v. Kayed Masoud and Ahmad Alnaasan |
LAKE CHARLES, La. â Two Lake Charles retail store owners pleaded guilty to selling more than 800 counterfeit items. |
William J. Burford v. Accounting Practices Sales, Inc. and Garry Holmes |
Plaintiff William J. Burford |
Milo Shamas v. Margaret A. Focarino |
The Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1141n, provides that a dissatisfied trademark applicant may seek review of an adverse ruling on his trademark application either by appealing the ruling to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, id. § 1071(a)(1), or by commencing a de novo action in a federal district court, id. § 1071(b)(1). If he elects to proceed in a district court and no adverse pa $0 (04-23-2015 - VA) |
United States of America v. Graciela Haydee Balderrama-Acevedo |
HOUSTON, TX â Graciela Haydee Balderrama-Acevedo, 53, has pleaded guilty and was sentenced for her part in a conspiracy to sell counterfeit Samsung batteries. |
Stephen Sedlock v. Timothy Baird |
For many in this country, the practice of yoga is an entirely secular experience undertaken for reasons such as increasing physical flexibility, decreasing pain, and reducing stress. For others, the practice of yoga is a religious ritual, undertaken for spiritual purposes. In this case, we are required to determine whether a school district's institution of a yoga program as a component of its phy $0 (04-03-2015 - CA) |
Joseph R. Willie, II v. Commission for Lawyer |
Willie represented his client, Don Collis Houston Jr., after Houston was |
Alterra Excess and Surplus Insurance Company v. Estate of Buckminstyer Fuller |
The Estate of Buckminster Fuller (Estate) appeals from a judgment on the pleadings holding that Alterra Excess and Surplus Insurance Company (Alterra) had no duty to defend, and therefore no duty to indemnify, its insured in an action brought by the Estate against the insured. The basis of the judgment was that an exclusion in the Alterra policy, referred to by all below as the âintellectual pro $0 (03-09-2015 - CA) |
James Gils v. Minerl Resources Internatinal, Inc. |
¶ 1 This appeal concerns a breach of fiduciary duty claim that was the subject of a successful summary judgment motion. Mineral Resources International, Inc. (MRI) challenges the district courtâs grant of summary judgment in favor of James Giles and award of attorney fees to Giles. The district court ruled that MRI had not presented sufficient evidence of actual damages caused by the alleged br $0 (10-30-2014 - UT) |
South Kingstown School Committee v. Joanna S. |
The Individuals with Disabilities |
Derma Pen, LLC v. 4Everyoung Limited |
Two companies, Derma Pen, LLC and 4EverYoung, entered a sales |
Haley Colombo v. BRP US, Inc. |
Defendants and appellants Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. and BRP US Inc. (collectively BRP) appeal a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs and respondents Haley Colombo and Jessica Slagel (hereafter referred to individually by first name or |
United States of America v. Samuel Ascolese |
Rapid City, SD - New York man convicted of Trafficking in Counterfeit Goods or Services was sentenced on October 17, 2014, by U.S. Chief Judge Jeffrey L. Viken, U.S. District Court. |
Jon Davler, Inc. v. Arch Insurance Company |
A group of employees brought an action against their employer, Jon Davler, Inc., for various employment claims, including sexual harassment, invasion of privacy, and false imprisonment. Jon Davler tendered the action to its insurer, Arch Insurance Company, which denied coverage based on an employment-related practices exclusion. After Jon Davler filed this insurance coverage action against Arch, t $0 (09-15-2014 - CA) |
Taylor Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLC |
Franchising, especially in the fast-food industry, has become a ubiquitous, lucrative, and thriving business model. This contractual arrangement benefits both parties. The franchisor, which sells the right to use its trademark and comprehensive business plan, can expand its enterprise while avoiding the risk and cost of running its own stores. The other party, the franchisee, independently owns, r $0 (08-28-2014 - CA) |
Next Page |