Anchorage, AK: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered $454,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of an accident caused by the failure to exercise due care on the part of a federal government employee while driving a motor vehicle.

Seattle, WA: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence and respondeat superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

Tacoma, WA: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence and respondeat superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Jason Robotkay, a federal government employee.

Reno, NV: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered injured and/or damaged as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

Phoenix, AZ: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of minors, B.R. and D.R.
on behalf of B.R. on behalf of D.R., who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a car wreck caused by a federal government employee.

Prescott, AZ: Personal injury wrongful death car wreck lawyer represented Plaitiff, surviving wife of decedent on her own behalf and on behalf of all statutory wrongful death beneficiaries on behalf of Lindy Wise deceased Robert Todd DeHardy other Barbara Wise Doyle on behalf of Rachael Breck on behalf of Brooke Wise on behalf of S.W. on behalf of B.W., who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims

Sioux Falls, SD: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

This case was filed in the First Judicial Circuit Court, Minnehaha county, case no. 01CIV20-17, and was removed to federal cou

Fort Smith, AR: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theor claiming to have suffered more than $2 million in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant.

Cleveland, OH: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming $85,000 in damages and/or injuries caused by a federal government employee.

Dayton, OH: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered $25,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of an accident caused by the federal government employee.

This case was filed in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 2021 CV 00904 and was removed to federal court

Tulsa, OK - Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence wrongful death theories claiming that their teenage son Cobie Tyner, age 18, was killed in a head-on motorcycle crash after a deputy made an improper U-turn in an attempt to pursue a different motorcyclist for speeding.

The Statement of the Case read to the jury s

Sioux Fallas, SD: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence and respondeat superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

Rapid City, SD: Personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence and respondeat superior theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by federal government employee.

28 U.S.C. 1346 provides:

(a) The district courts shall have o

Houston, TX: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

Houston, TX: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by United States Postal Service employee.

McAllen, TX: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee..

Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

Brooklyn, NY: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

White Plains, NY: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

Generally speaking all negligence cases have the same three elements: (1) failure to exercise due care, (2) injury as a direct result of

Boston, MA: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a an accident caused by a federal government employee's failure to exercise due care.

Generally speaking all negligence cases have the same three elements: (1) failure to exe

Boston, MA: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by federal government employee.

New Haven, CT: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

Generally speaking all negligence cases have the same three elements: (1) failure to exercise due care, (2) injur