El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, which sued defendant on a tort interference with contact theory claiming more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Plaintiff claimed that he graduated from the University of Oklahoma Law School in 1993. One of his first clients was the Cheyenne Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma and provided legal services to the tribe relating t

Tulsa, Oklahoma pro se plaintiffs sued the City of Tulsa on a Governmental Tort Claims Act negligence theories claiming that they suffered $25,000 in damages as a direct result of the City storm sewer failing with the result that sink holes developed on their property causing their patio to collapse.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Governmental Tort Claims Act (51 O.S. 156) negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Plaintiff claimed that on August 19, 2018, Plaintiff fell into a hole along Highway 75, near Lewis and Apache created by Defendant and not covered and was seriously injured

Houston, Texas civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued defendant on a job discrimination theory.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed suit against
Ryan’s Pointe Houston, L.L.C. and Advantage Property Management,
L.L.C., alleging the companies had engaged in national origin and sex-based
discrimination. Magali Villalobos, the subject of the adverse

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a wrongful termination theory.


Plaintiff Chris Whinery was employed by Defendant Premier Funeral Management Group IV, LLC (“Premier”) from the time it purchased his parents' funeral home business in October 2014 until Premier terminated his employment in December 2019. At the time of the

Houston, Texas personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory.

Roundup is an herbicide used to kill weeds. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Roundup. In 1985, the Environmental Protection Agency briefly classified glyphosate as a possible human carcinogen after a study found that “glyphosate was oncogenic in male mice.” Since then

Columbus, Ohio civil rights violation lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a right to medicaid theory.


{¶ 1} The appellants in this case are Amanda and Bud Masters, individually and as mother and father and next friends of F.M., a minor (collectively the "Masters"). The appellees are the Ohio Department of Medicaid ("Department"), Maureen Corcoran, Director of the De

¶1 Pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S. 1981 §§ 1601 et seq., the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma certified for this court's answer the following question:

"Where an at-will employee terminated by a private employer files suit alleging facts that, if true, violate state and federal statutes providing remedies for emplo

¶1 This appeal presents an issue of first impression. Did the trial court err by instructing the jury on manufacturers' products liability when a design defect caused only deterioration in the product itself resulting in purely economic loss? We answer in the affirmative and hold that such a claim must be pursued as a warranty action.

¶2 There is a second issue. Did the trial court err