Emily Gallup v. The Superior Court of Nevada County |
Defendant Superior Court of Nevada County (SCNC) appeals a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff and former employee Emily Gallup. Gallup brought this action alleging, in part, that SCNC retaliated against her in violation of Labor Code section 1102.5, subdivision (b)1 for engaging in protected activity when she complained to her |
Parisa, Inc. v. City of Tulsa |
Tulsa, OK - Parisa, Inc. sued the City of Tulsa on a Governmental Tort Claims Negligence theory. |
Juan Francisco Montalvo, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., et al v. Gabriela Lopez |
Appellee Gabriela Lopez filed the underlying lawsuit alleging health care liability claims against appellants Juan Francisco Montalvo, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., Winder N. Vasquez, M.D., Miguel E. Najera, J.D., Executor of the Estate of Miguel E. Najera, M.D., Deceased, and Laredo Regional Medical Center, L.P. d/b/a Doctors Hospital of Laredo. The appellants moved for summary judgment asserting Lopez’s c $0 (04-08-2015 - TX) |
Richard J. Malouf, DDS; Richard J, Malouf, DDS, PC; and Richard J. Malouf, DDS, PA v. The State of Texas ex rel. Dr. Christine Ellis, DDS and Madelayne Castillo |
This interlocutory appeal presents the issue of whether claims brought by appellees |
Thomas DePrince v. Starboard Cruise Services, Inc. |
Thomas DePrince (“DePrince”) appeals the trial court’s order granting |
Stephen Paul v. Richard Patton |
The decedent, Gilbert Paul, retained attorney Richard Patton to draft an amendment to his revocable living trust. The decedent signed the “Trust Amendment,” which, as drafted by Patton, named the decedent’s wife, Helen, and his children, Stephen Paul, David Paul, Alan Paul, and Nancy Dybdahl as beneficiaries. Stephen and David Paul also are the successor trustees of the trust. Following the $0 (04-09-2015 - CA) |
Jeremy Alan Williams v. Anita Trammell |
In this habeas case, Jeremy Alan Williams challenges his Oklahoma conviction for |
United States of America v. Jantran, Inc. |
The Miss Dixie is a cargo line boat operated by Jantran, a company |
F. Wood Boyce v. T.D. Service Company |
"There are no free houses." These are the words of the bankruptcy judge who allowed the instant home foreclosure to go forward. It rejected appellant's theory of "wrongful foreclosure." Thereafter, the same theory was rejected in an unlawful detainer proceeding. Undeterred, appellant F. Wood Boyce sued his lender for "wrongful foreclosure" because the $1.155 million deed of trust was placed in a m $0 (03-23-2015 - CA) |
CAROLYN A BETHEA V. BROWN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS |
Oklahoma City, OK - Carolyn Bethea sued Brown Mechanical Contractors on a personal injury tort theory: |
Lois Clarkson v. Academny Ltd., d/b/a Academy Sports & Outdoors |
Oklahoma City, OK - Lois Clarkson sued Academny Ltd., d/b/a Academy Sports & Outdoors on an auto negligence theory claiming: |
Eclectic Investments, LLC v. Richard Patterson and Jackson County |
Jackson County (the county) is a defendant in this |
Phillip Estrada v. Dennis Kriz, Hodges Transportation, Mid-America Pallett, L.L.C. |
1 Plaintiff/Appellant Phillip Estrada (Estrada) appeals the trial court's Order granting the motion to dismiss of Defendants/Appellees Dennis Kriz, Hodges Transport, Mid-America Pallet, LLC, et al. (collectively, Defendants). Defendants moved for dismissal "based upon [Estrada's] failure to plead [fraud] with particularity, the Doctrine of Laches and the Doctrine of Equitable Estoppel." Based on $0 (01-29-2015 - OK) |
S.K. Peightal Engineers, Ltd. v. Mid Valley Real Estate Solutions V, L.L.C. |
¶1 Petitioners have requested that we review two issues arising from the court of appeals’ opinion issued on interlocutory appeal under C.A.R. 4.2. We must decide: (1) whether entities that did not exist at the time the relevant contracts were completed can still be subject to the economic loss rule through the interrelated contracts doctrine; and (2) whether commercial entities situate $0 (02-09-2015 - CO) |
Dean Craft v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company |
¶1 We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to C.A.R. 21.1 to answer questions of state law certified to this court by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding the applicability of the “notice-prejudice rule” to claims-made insurance policies. |
Daniel William Bean v. Pacific Coast Elevator Corporation |
Eric Lazear, an employee of appellant Pacific Coast Elevator Corporation (Pacific Coast), ran his vehicle into appellant Daniel William Bean's truck while Bean was stopped at a red light. Bean suffered serious injuries as a result of the accident and sued Pacific Coast. A jury found Pacific Coast negligent and awarded Bean $1,271,594.74 in damages, including $126,594.74 in economic damages, and $1 $0 (03-10-2015 - CA) |
United States of America v. Exide Technologies |
LOS ANGELES – The United States and Exide Technologies have reached an agreement that calls for the battery manufacturing company to immediately and forever close a battery recycling facility in Vernon and to pay $50 million to clean-up the site and surrounding neighborhoods, which have been affected by environmental toxins for close to a century. |
Duane and Donna Kerns v. Woodshed IV, L.L.C. and Woodshed of Monkey Island, L.L.C. |
Jay, OK - Duane and Donna Kerns sued Woodshed IV, L.L.C. and Woodshed of Monkey Island, L.L.C. on wrongful death negligence theories claiming that Defendants sold their underage son Colton a bottle of vodka and, as a direct result, the was involved in an auto accident and was killed. The alleged that their son had successfully purchased alcohol at Defendant's store on numerous occasions without be $1500000 (03-13-2015 - OK) |
Sheryl D. Mabie v. Jack Freeman and Graham & Freeman, P.L.L.C. |
Tulsa, OK - Sheryl D. Mabie sued Jack Freeman and Graham & Freeman, P.L.L.C. on breach of contract theories alleging: |
RICK WOOD v. TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY |
We issued an opinion in this case on December 30, 2014, affirming the trial court’s judgment. Appellant, Rick Wood, subsequently filed a motion for rehearing. Without changing our previous disposition, we deny the motion for rehearing, |
James Wimpy v. Motel 6 Operating, L.P. |
This is an appeal from the grant of a summary judgment in a premises liability case. James Wimpy, Appellant here and plaintiff at the trial court, failed to file a response to a no-evidence and traditional motion for summary judgment advanced by Motel 6. We are asked to consider whether Wimpy received adequate notice of the summary judgment hearing, and whether the trial court abused its discretio $0 (03-04-2015 - TX) |
Heritage Constructors, Inc. v. Chrietzberg Electric, Inc., and Richard Marc Chrietzberg |
The deadline was looming for aspiring prime contractors to submit their bids to TexAmericas Center to build a wastewater treatment plant on its property in Bowie County. The subcontract bid of Chrietzberg Electric, Inc. (Electric) submitted at the last minute by Richard Marc Chrietzberg (Chrietzberg) to aspiring prime contractor Heritage Constructors, Inc. (Heritage), for the electrical portion of $0 (03-04-2015 - TX) |
Domaniqueca Dickson v. Burke Williams, Inc. |
Defendant and appellant Burke Williams, Inc. (defendant) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and respondent Domaniqueca Dickson (plaintiff) on her claims under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.1) for failure to take reasonable steps necessary to prevent sexual harassment or discrimination (§ 12940, subd. (k)), and the trial court $0 (03-08-2015 - CA) |
Andrea Smith v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy International Limited, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Johnson & Johnson International and Christian P. Luessenhop, M.D. |
Tulsa, OK - Andrea Smith sued Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy International Limited, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Johnson & Johnson International and Christian P. Luessenhop, M.D. |
Duane R. Mueller v. Carolyn Hill |
This is an appeal out of Bonner County from a judgment awarding damages for common law trespass and attorney fees for statutory trespass. We affirm the judgment except for $1,000 of the damages awarded and remand for the entry of an amended judgment. |
Next Page |