Nashville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

Memphis, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpracice negligence theory.

Kansas City, Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to sell stolen catalytic converters.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available.

Albany, New York insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendant on bad faith breach of an insurance contract.

This case was file din the NYS Supreme Court - County of Albany, 900400-23, and was removed to federal court by Travelers Commercial Insurance Company.

In New York, while there isn't a separate tort for bad faith like some other states, there are st

Bay City, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

Detroit, Michigan insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Wayne County Circuit Court, 21-015352-CK, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.


Key elements of a bad faith claim in Michigan:

Breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing: This duty

Grand Rapids, Michigan insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on bad faith breach of insurance contract theories.


Key elements of a bad faith claim in Michigan:

Breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing: This duty requires the insurance company to handle claims promptly, fairly, and in accordance with the terms of the policy.

Oxford, Mississippi personal injury lawyer presented the Plaintiff who sued the defendants for wrongful termination.

Quilton McGee filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi against Felder Services, LLC, and Lafayette LTC, Inc dba Oxford Health and Rehabilitation. Doc. #1. The complaint contains four counts: (1) “ Count I: Sex Discrimi

Wilmington, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

The Federal Tort Claims Act:

A United States law that permits citizens to sue the federal government for certain torts (civil wrongs) committed by its employees.
It's a significant exception to the sovereign immunity princi

Sana Antonio, Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer represented the Defendant convicted at trial of selling non-controlled but dangerous substances through the mail

Wilmington, Delaware personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Federal Tort Claim Act civil rights violation theories.

The Complaint

Norfolk, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims act negligence theory.

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) is a United States law that allows citizens to sue the federal government for certain kinds of torts (civil wrongs) committed by its employees. This is a significant exception to the principle of sovereign immunity, wh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

Plaintiffs complain of environmental contamination and polluting events upon their
property and their persons caused by the conduct and activities of the Defendants herein.
Defendants have caused the dispersion of coal ash and its fugitive dust on to the Plai

New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theories.

Tuscaloosa, Alabama personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Atlanta, Georgia personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure of a federal government employee to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.

Georgia Auto Negligence Law: Key Points

Georgia auto neg

Atlanta, Georgia personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Georgia Auto Negligence Law: Key Points

Georgia auto negligence law focuses on determining who is responsible for damages caused by car accidents. Here are some

Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Cliams Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered $150,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a federal government employee failing to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.

Casper, Wyoming personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care by a federal government employee causing a motor vehicle accident.

Wyoming Auto Negligence Law: A Summary

Wyoming's auto negligen

Denver, Colorado personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries directly caused by the failure of a federal employee to use due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.

Colorado Auto Negligence Law: Key Points

Colorado's auto negligence law

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a federal government employee's failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.

New Mexico Auto Negligence Law:

"Pure Comparative Negl

Honolulu, Hawaii personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Clims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care by a federal government employee.

Hawaii Auto Negligence Law:

"Duty of Care: All drivers in Hawaii have a duty to operate their

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee.

Helena, Montana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee.

Here's an overview of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA):

What it is:

A federal st