San Antonio, Texas pro se Plaintiff sued on a job discrimination theory.

42 U.S. Code § 2000e, also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It applies to employers, employment agencies, and labor organizations.

Here's a breakdown of key aspects:
More...   $0 (08-04-2025 - TX)

New Orleans, Louisiana employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on Fair Labor Standards Act violation theories.

Over the course of four years and through three consolidated cases, individual employees (Plaintiffs-Appellees) sued Defendants for unpaid overtime, minimum wages, final wages, and damages for wrongful termination under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 20... More...   $0 (08-04-2025 - LA)

Albany, New York employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued an a wrongful termination civil rights violation theory.

Plaintiff Samantha Long, who previously served as the Clerk of the Town Justice Court for the Town of New Lebanon, sues defendants the Town of New Lebanon and Jessica Byrne, a former Town Justice, alleging that they unlawfully fired her because she cooperated ... More...   $0 (08-01-2025 - NY)

Providence, Rhode Island personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory.

he Naval Undersea Warfare Center ("the Warfare Center"), a division of the U.S. Navy focused on the research and development of submersible weapons systems, asked Appellant Matthew Waleyko to resign at the end of his two-year term of probationary employment. After his ter... More...   $0 (07-31-2025 - MI)

Toledo, Ohio employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on a wrongful termination claim.


Plaintiffs John James, Aaron Tiffany, and Christopher Kopf are former employees of Norfolk Southern Railway (NSR) whose terminations were upheld in arbitrations under the Railway Labor Act (RLA). They bring fraud claims regarding the arbitrator selected to adjudicate their terminations, nam... More...   $0 (07-25-2025 - OK)

Columbus, Ohio employmentlaw lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful termination theory.


Monica Gray helped a colleague secure an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The colleague’s supervisor opposed the accommodation and, a few months later, reported Gray for timecard falsification. State Farm investigated the report and fired Gray. Gray... More...   $0 (07-25-2025 - OH)

Grand Rapids, Michigan employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

After 25 years of employment at Plastics & Coatings USA, Inc. it fired Dawn Hayes from her job as a warehouse logistics clerk. The company claims that she was laid off as part of a workforce reduction program; Hayes argues that she was terminated because of her gender and age. H... More...   $0 (07-25-2025 - MI)

DAllas, texas insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.


In 2012, Black began working as operations support administrative
assistant for Paycom Payroll, LLC. As an employee, she participated in
Paycom’s group insurance plan, which was governed by ERISA and
administered by Unum. Under the policy, a plan participant q... More...   $0 (07-24-2025 - TX)

Omaha, Nebraska employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a sex discrimination theory.

In March 2019, Beran was hired to work as a certified nursing assistant at Linden Court, a
skilled nursing facility. Linden Court is owned by the defendant, VSL North Platte
Court, LLC, and we will refer to the appellant as Linden Court.

In December 2019... More...   $0 (07-17-2025 - NE)

Grand Rapids, Michigan employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

Aaron Pulsifer was fired from his job as the Dean of Students and Assistant Principal at Westshore Christian Academy. He then sued the Academy under a variety of state and federal laws that prohibit discriminatory employment practices.

Westshore Christian Academy is a ... More...   $0 (07-15-2025 - MI)

Nashville, Tennessee civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a music royalty dispute.

In all its many forms, music is a powerful influence. One of music’s great gifts is its knack for soothing the mind. Think of the way listening to your favorite song takes you to a place where, at least temporarily, life’s frustrations
are quickly set aside. Music’s perhaps most end... More...   $0 (07-15-2025 - TN)

Newark, New Jersey employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Warn Act Claim.

Former employees of Party City filed a class action lawsuit against the company claiming the corporation violated worker protection laws when mass layoffs occurred in September, according to lawsuit documents.

In the lawsuit, "Sonia Agostino, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situa... More...   $0 (07-13-2025 - NJ)

Carrollton, Georgia civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a contract dispute over a home sale.

Deborah Green sued Carolin Clark Wilhite and Sonrisa, Inc. (collectively, "the defendants") for declaratory relief, specific performance, injunctive relief, and interpleader relating to issues involving the purchase and sale of a home in Carroll County. The trial court granted summ... More...   $0 (07-10-2025 - GA)

Miami, Florida civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a First Amendment violation theory.

John Labriola was a media aide for the Miami-Dade Board
of County Commissioners. Labriola v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 693 F.
Supp. 3d 1284, 1287 (S.D. Fla. 2023). In his own name and on his
own time, Labriola wrote an opinion piece that criticized the
Equality Act, an as-y... More...   $0 (07-10-2025 - FL)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on behalf of her mother on a wrongful denial of E.R.I.S.A. benefits.

Congress enacted the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) to protect employee-benefit-plan participants and their beneficiaries by authorizing civil suits for ERISA violations. Here, Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insuranc... More...   $0 (07-08-2025 - ok)

Wichita, Kansas family law lawyers represent man and wife in an adoption case.

"1. On or about December 17, 2023[,] Baby Boy [S.] was born in Wichita, Sedgwick [C]ounty[,] Kansas.

"2. [R.S.] . . . is the natural mother of Baby Boy [S.]. [R.S.] has filed a consent to allow Baby Boy [S.] to be adopted.

"3. In connection with the adoption proceeding, [R.S.] f... More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - KS)

Charleston, West Virginia employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a breach of contract theory.

Luna’s relationship with Gryphon was documented in an Independent Contractor Agreement between The Texan and Gryphon. The Agreement explained in its opening paragraph that it was “entered into . . . between GryphonESP, LLC (the ‘Company’) and The Texan LLC (‘Contractor’).... More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - WV)

Milwaukee, Wisconsin civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful termination theory.

Marissa Darlingh was employed as a guidance counselor at an elementary school in the Milwaukee Public School District. In April 2022 she attended a rally at the state capitol in Madison featuring “radical feminist” critiques of the transgender-rights movement. There she deliv... More...   $0 (07-02-2025 - WI)

Denver, Colorado employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a job discrimination claim.

Darren Markley sued his employer, US Bank, in federal court, asserting a federal claim for age discrimination and a state law claim for wrongful termination. The district court resolved the federal claim in the employer’s favor but declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state... More...   $0 (06-24-2025 - CO)

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a malicious prosecution theory.

The parties do not dispute that in both Colorado and California, a claim for malicious prosecution requires the plaintiff to establish that the previous action, which was allegedly prosecuted maliciously (here the suit against Wyles by West Hills), ended in his favor. See Hewitt v. Rice, 1... More...   $0 (06-23-2025 - CO)

Tampa, Florida consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Sarasota County Court, 2025 SC 003458, which was removed to federal county by the Defendant.

* * *

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law that aims to eliminate abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt colle... More...   $1 (06-20-2025 - FL)

Fort Myers, Florida consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory.

* * *

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law that aims to eliminate abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by third-party debt collectors
. It protects consumers from being harassed or threatened by debt collectors. ... More...   $0 (06-20-2025 - FL)

El Paso, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination theory.

In 2001, EchoStar Communications Corporation (“EchoStar”) hired
Appellant Jesus Yanez as a customer service representative at its El Paso,
Texas location. As part of his day one onboarding, Yanez allegedly signed an
arbitration agreement purporting to bind Yanez, ... More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - TX)

Anderson, South Carolina insurance lawyer lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking restoration of long-term disability benefits.

Penland stopped working in August 2015 following complications from colon surgery and various other conditions. He pplied for long-term disability benefits from his employer, and in February 2016, those benefits were approved. Under the terms of his employer’s... More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - SC)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers are representing the Plaintiffs on 42 U.S.C. 2000e job discrimination theories.


COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs Greta J. Hurt and Julie D. Lynn, ("Hurt" and "Lynn") allege:
1. This action is brought on behalf of the Plaintiffs to enforce the provisions of Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq. ("Title VII... More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - OK)